These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28204882)

  • 1. Comparison between vaginal and sublingual misoprostol 50 µg for cervical ripening prior to induction of labor: randomized clinical trial.
    Conde A; Ben S; Tarigo J; Artucio S; Varela V; Grimaldi P; Sosa C; Alonso J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Apr; 295(4):839-844. PubMed ID: 28204882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 25 µg sublingual and 50 µg intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor: a randomized controlled equivalence trial.
    Sharami SH; Milani F; Faraji R; Bloukimoghadam K; Salamat F; Momenzadeh S; Ebrahimi H
    Arch Iran Med; 2014 Oct; 17(10):652-6. PubMed ID: 25305762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.
    Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study.
    Zahran KM; Shahin AY; Abdellah MS; Elsayh KI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20144171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Dadashaliha M; Fallah S; Mirzadeh M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Oct; 21(1):721. PubMed ID: 34706675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattás DSMB; de Amorim MMR; Feitosa FEL; da Silva-Junior JR; Ribeiro LCG; Souza GFA; Souza ASR
    Reprod Health; 2020 Apr; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 32272959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sublingual vs. vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Feitosa FE; Sampaio ZS; Alencar CA; Amorim MM; Passini R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Aug; 94(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 16828095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Khoury AN; Zhou QP; Gorenberg DM; Nies BM; Manley GE; Mecklenburg FE
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol.
    Meydanli MM; Calişkan E; Burak F; Narin MA; Atmaca R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 81(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12767565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Buccal versus intravaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening.
    Carlan SJ; Blust D; O'Brien WF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 186(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 11854640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.
    Haas DM; Daggy J; Flannery KM; Dorr ML; Bonsack C; Bhamidipalli SS; Pierson RC; Lathrop A; Towns R; Ngo N; Head A; Morgan S; Quinney SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):259.e1-259.e16. PubMed ID: 31075246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Tran S; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1237-40; discussion 1240-3. PubMed ID: 12066104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Al-Ibraheemi Z; Brustman L; Bimson BE; Porat N; Rosenn B
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 29215514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
    Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intravaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate and misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial.
    Abdellah MS; Hussien M; Aboalhassan A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jul; 284(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20582425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.