These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28205020)

  • 1. A comparison of the results of prospective and retrospective cohort studies in the field of digestive surgery.
    Ukai T; Shikata S; Nakayama T; Takemura YC
    Surg Today; 2017 Jul; 47(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 28205020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of effects in randomized controlled trials with observational studies in digestive surgery.
    Shikata S; Nakayama T; Noguchi Y; Taji Y; Yamagishi H
    Ann Surg; 2006 Nov; 244(5):668-76. PubMed ID: 17060757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures.
    Lonjon G; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Ahmad N; Aim F; Nizard R; Ravaud P
    Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 24096758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective oropharyngeal decontamination versus selective digestive decontamination in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao D; Song J; Gao X; Gao F; Wu Y; Lu Y; Hou K
    Drug Des Devel Ther; 2015; 9():3617-24. PubMed ID: 26203227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Twenty-year perspective of randomized controlled trials for surgery of chronic nonspecific low back pain: citation bias and tangential knowledge.
    Andrade NS; Flynn JP; Bartanusz V
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1698-704. PubMed ID: 24012430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of reports in surgery journals.
    Rosenthal R; Dwan K
    Ann Surg; 2013 Jun; 257(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 23478520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized controlled trials on hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.
    Kaido T
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2004; 11(6):381-9. PubMed ID: 15619013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in results from randomized, controlled trials: stochastic or systematic?
    Jane-wit D; Horwitz RI; Concato J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19740624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.
    Lewsey JD; Leyland AH; Murray GD; Boddy FA
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(22):1-55. PubMed ID: 11074392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer: the role of adjuvant and multimodal therapies.
    Kleeff J; Michalski CW; Friess H; Büchler MW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Sep; 33(7):817-23. PubMed ID: 17331695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials.
    Abraham NS; Byrne CJ; Young JM; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 19716267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy versus effectiveness: a direct comparison of the outcome of treatment for mild to moderate depression in randomized controlled trials and daily practice.
    van der Lem R; van der Wee NJ; van Veen T; Zitman FG
    Psychother Psychosom; 2012; 81(4):226-34. PubMed ID: 22584117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer: results in the 1990-ies].
    Fodor J; Polgár C; Németh G
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(28):1551-5. PubMed ID: 10957865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why have meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of the association between non-white-blood-cell-reduced allogeneic blood transfusion and postoperative infection produced discordant results?
    Vamvakas EC
    Vox Sang; 2007 Oct; 93(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 17845256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
    LeLorier J; Grégoire G; Benhaddad A; Lapierre J; Derderian F
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):536-42. PubMed ID: 9262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding?
    Fergusson D; Glass KC; Hutton B; Shapiro S
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(3):218-29; discussion 229-32. PubMed ID: 16279145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable.
    Rerkasem K; Rothwell PM
    Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 20155790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The most appropriate primary outcomes to design clinical trials on Huntington's disease: meta-analyses of cohort studies and randomized placebo-controlled trials.
    Salem L; Saleh N; Youssov K; Olivier A; Charles P; Scherer C; Verny C; Bachoud-Lévi AC; Maison P
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):700-10. PubMed ID: 24702447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.