217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28205186)
1. Optimisation of cognitive performance in rodent operant (touchscreen) testing: Evaluation and effects of reinforcer strength.
Phillips BU; Heath CJ; Ossowska Z; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM
Learn Behav; 2017 Sep; 45(3):252-262. PubMed ID: 28205186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing reproducibility of operant testing through reinforcer standardization: identification of key nutritional constituents determining reward strength in touchscreens.
Kim EW; Phillips BU; Heath CJ; Cho SY; Kim H; Sreedharan J; Song HT; Lee JE; Bussey TJ; Kim CH; Kim E; Saksida LM
Mol Brain; 2017 Jul; 10(1):31. PubMed ID: 28716096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation and optimisation of a touchscreen progressive ratio test of motivation in male rats.
Hailwood JM; Heath CJ; Robbins TW; Saksida LM; Bussey TJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Sep; 235(9):2739-2753. PubMed ID: 30008032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of D-amphetamine on responding for candy and fruit drink using a fixed ratio and a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcer delivery.
Foltin RW; Evans SM
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2001; 69(1-2):125-31. PubMed ID: 11420077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dopamine depleting agent tetrabenazine alters effort-related decision making as assessed by mouse touchscreen procedures.
Yang JH; Presby RE; Rotolo RA; Quiles T; Okifo K; Zorda E; Fitch RH; Correa M; Salamone JD
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Sep; 237(9):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 32561947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of progressive ratio schedules versus behavioral economic measures: effect of an alternative reinforcer on the reinforcing efficacy of phencyclidine.
Rodefer JS; Carroll ME
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Jul; 132(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 9272765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction of drug self-administration by an alternative non-drug reinforcer in rhesus monkeys: magnitude and temporal effects.
Campbell UC; Carroll ME
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Jan; 147(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 10672636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operant sensation seeking in the mouse.
Olsen CM; Winder DG
J Vis Exp; 2010 Nov; (45):. PubMed ID: 21113110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Operant responding for sucrose by rats bred for high or low saccharin consumption.
Gosnell BA; Mitra A; Avant RA; Anker JJ; Carroll ME; Levine AS
Physiol Behav; 2010 Mar; 99(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 20096717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resistance to extinction and behavioral momentum.
Nevin JA
Behav Processes; 2012 May; 90(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 22425781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of reinforcer quality and step size on rats' performance under progressive ratio schedules.
Covarrubias P; Aparicio CF
Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 18346855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mouse strain differences in oral operant ethanol reinforcement under continuous access conditions.
Risinger FO; Brown MM; Doan AM; Oakes RA
Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1998 May; 22(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 9622450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.
Hutsell BA; Newland MC
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2013 Mar; 101():85-93. PubMed ID: 23357283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aggression as positive reinforcement in mice under various ratio- and time-based reinforcement schedules.
May ME; Kennedy CH
J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 19794833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of reinforcement schedule on experience-dependent changes in motivation.
Johnson AR; Christensen BA; Kelly SJ; Calipari ES
J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 May; 117(3):320-330. PubMed ID: 35344601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Central opioid receptors differentially regulate the nalmefene-induced suppression of ethanol- and saccharin-reinforced behaviors in alcohol-preferring (P) rats.
June HL; Cummings R; Eiler WJ; Foster KL; McKay PF; Seyoum R; Garcia M; McCane S; Grey C; Hawkins SE; Mason D
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2004 Feb; 29(2):285-99. PubMed ID: 14603266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intravenous and oral caffeine self-administration in rats.
Bradley CA; Palmatier MI
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2019 Oct; 203():72-82. PubMed ID: 31404852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates.
Bai JYH; Podlesnik CA
Behav Processes; 2017 May; 138():29-33. PubMed ID: 28216120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Free operant and discrete trial performance of mice in the nine-hole box apparatus: validation using amphetamine and scopolamine.
Bensadoun JC; Brooks SP; Dunnett SB
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jul; 174(3):396-405. PubMed ID: 14985934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motivational assessment of mice using the touchscreen operant testing system: effects of dopaminergic drugs.
Heath CJ; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Nov; 232(21-22):4043-57. PubMed ID: 26156636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
