These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28205186)

  • 21. Equal response rates maintained by concurrent drug and nondrug reinforcers: a design for treatment evaluation.
    Meisch RA; Gomez TH; Lane SD
    Behav Pharmacol; 2020 Aug; 31(5):458-464. PubMed ID: 31770113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
    Alvarez-Sekely CS; Toscano-Zapien AL; Salles-Ize P; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Lopez-Guzman MA; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104822. PubMed ID: 36669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Escalation of food-maintained responding and sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in mice.
    Goeders JE; Murnane KS; Banks ML; Fantegrossi WE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2009 Jul; 93(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 19376153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Operant responding in Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens) as a function of schedule of reinforcement and visual reinforcers.
    Turnbough PD; Lloyd KE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 4759058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nucleus accumbens neurons in the rat exhibit differential activity to conditioned reinforcers and primary reinforcers within a second-order schedule of saccharin reinforcement.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(10):2777-88. PubMed ID: 15548221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evidence for impairment of behavioural inhibition in performance of operant tasks in tPA-/- mice.
    Ripley TL; Horwood JM; Stephens DN
    Behav Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 125(1-2):215-27. PubMed ID: 11682113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Task parameters influence operant response variability in mice.
    Follman EG; Chevée M; Kim CJ; Johnson AR; Tat J; Leonard MZ; Calipari ES
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2023 Jan; 240(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 36572717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Aggression as a reinforcer: operant behavor in the mouse-killing rat.
    Van Hemel PE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Mar; 17(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 5062954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pharmacological studies of effort-related decision making using mouse touchscreen procedures: effects of dopamine antagonism do not resemble reinforcer devaluation by removal of food restriction.
    Yang JH; Presby RE; Jarvie AA; Rotolo RA; Fitch RH; Correa M; Salamone JD
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Jan; 237(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 31392358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preratio pausing: effects of an alternative reinforcer on fixed- and variable-ratio responding.
    Derenne A; Baron A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 12083680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of a non-drug reinforcer, saccharin, on oral self-administration of phencyclidine in male and female rhesus monkeys.
    Cosgrove KP; Carroll ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Oct; 170(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12838382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Food Restriction Level and Reinforcement Schedule Differentially Influence Behavior during Acquisition and Devaluation Procedures in Mice.
    Chevée M; Kim CJ; Crow N; Follman EG; Leonard MZ; Calipari ES
    eNeuro; 2023 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 37696663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Role for the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor in Top-Down Cognitive Processing Using a Touchscreen Visual Discrimination Task in Mice.
    Gould RW; Dencker D; Grannan M; Bubser M; Zhan X; Wess J; Xiang Z; Locuson C; Lindsley CW; Conn PJ; Jones CK
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 6(10):1683-95. PubMed ID: 26176846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rich-lean transitions produced by stimuli associated with accurate and inaccurate responding by pigeons.
    Toegel F; Toegel C; Yahrmarkt C; Perone M
    Behav Processes; 2023 Apr; 207():104858. PubMed ID: 36934796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Weaver mutant mice exhibit long-term learning deficits under several measures of instrumental behavior.
    Derenne A; Arsenault ML; Austin DP; Weatherly JN
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Dec; 92(5):1002-9. PubMed ID: 17826805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stimulus dynamics increase the self-administration of compound visual and auditory stimuli.
    Olsen CM; Winder DG
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Mar; 511(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 22249116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.