910 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28205306)
1. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fully automated segmentation of oncological PET volumes using a combined multiscale and statistical model.
Montgomery DW; Amira A; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):722-36. PubMed ID: 17388190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: threshold contouring and lesion volumes.
Ford EC; Kinahan PE; Hanlon L; Alessio A; Rajendran J; Schwartz DL; Phillips M
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4280-8. PubMed ID: 17153406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of zeolites to generate PET phantoms for the validation of quantification strategies in oncology.
Zito F; De Bernardi E; Soffientini C; Canzi C; Casati R; Gerundini P; Baselli G
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5353-61. PubMed ID: 22957603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated model-based quantitative analysis of phantoms with spherical inserts in FDG PET scans.
Ulrich EJ; Sunderland JJ; Smith BJ; Mohiuddin I; Parkhurst J; Plichta KA; Buatti JM; Beichel RR
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):258-276. PubMed ID: 29091269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.
Shiri I; Rahmim A; Ghaffarian P; Geramifar P; Abdollahi H; Bitarafan-Rajabi A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4498-4509. PubMed ID: 28567548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combining multiple FDG-PET radiotherapy target segmentation methods to reduce the effect of variable performance of individual segmentation methods.
McGurk RJ; Bowsher J; Lee JA; Das SK
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042501. PubMed ID: 23556917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multisite Technical and Clinical Performance Evaluation of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers from 3D FDG PET Segmentations of Head and Neck Cancer Images.
Smith BJ; Buatti JM; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Kinahan PE; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Beichel RR
Tomography; 2020 Jun; 6(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 32548282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.
Doot RK; Scheuermann JS; Christian PE; Karp JS; Kinahan PE
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6035-46. PubMed ID: 21158315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET.
Belhassen S; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1309-24. PubMed ID: 20384268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Dirichlet process mixture model for automatic (18)F-FDG PET image segmentation: Validation study on phantoms and on lung and esophageal lesions.
Giri MG; Cavedon C; Mazzarotto R; Ferdeghini M
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2491. PubMed ID: 27147360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An algorithm for PET tumor volume and activity quantification: without specifying camera's point spread function (PSF).
Bhatt R; Adjouadi M; Goryawala M; Gulec SA; McGoron AJ
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4187-202. PubMed ID: 22830752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of alterations in positron emission tomography imaging parameters on radiomics features.
Ger RB; Meier JG; Pahlka RB; Gay S; Mumme R; Fuller CD; Li H; Howell RM; Layman RR; Stafford RJ; Zhou S; Mawlawi O; Court LE
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221877. PubMed ID: 31487307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time.
Brown C; Dempsey MF; Gillen G; Elliott AT
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20032801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A gel tumour phantom for assessment of the accuracy of manual and automatic delineation of gross tumour volume from FDG-PET/CT.
Skretting A; Evensen JF; Løndalen AM; Bogsrud TV; Glomset OK; Eilertsen K
Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):636-44. PubMed ID: 23075421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A region growing method for tumor volume segmentation on PET images for rectal and anal cancer patients.
Day E; Betler J; Parda D; Reitz B; Kirichenko A; Mohammadi S; Miften M
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4349-58. PubMed ID: 19928065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
