These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28207430)

  • 1. Evaluation of augmented pulse pressure variation using the Valsalva manoeuvre as a predictor of fluid responsiveness under open-chest conditions: A prospective observational study.
    Min JJ; Kim TK; Lee JH; Park J; Cho HS; Kim WS; Lee YT
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 May; 34(5):254-261. PubMed ID: 28207430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Infants Undergoing Ventricular Septal Defect Repair with Median Sternotomy or Minimally Invasive Right Thoracotomy.
    Han D; Liu YG; Luo Y; Li J; Ou-Yang C
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):184-190. PubMed ID: 27837303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Lee JH; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Gil NS; Kim KB; Hong DM; Kim HJ
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21924634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Kramer A; Zygun D; Hawes H; Easton P; Ferland A
    Chest; 2004 Nov; 126(5):1563-8. PubMed ID: 15539728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness in liver cirrhosis patients using dynamic preload variables: A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.
    Wu CY; Cheng YJ; Liu YJ; Wu TT; Chien CT; Chan KC;
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 27167058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.
    Jun JH; Chung RK; Baik HJ; Chung MH; Hyeon JS; Lee YG; Park SH
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31390982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utility of stroke volume variation measured using non-invasive bioreactance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in the prone position.
    Min JJ; Lee JH; Hong KY; Choi SJ
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):397-405. PubMed ID: 26964992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arterial pressure changes during the Valsalva maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients.
    Monge García MI; Gil Cano A; Díaz Monrové JC
    Intensive Care Med; 2009 Jan; 35(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 18830578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.
    Biais M; Calderon J; Pernot M; Barandon L; Couffinhal T; Ouattara A; Sztark F
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1101-7. PubMed ID: 24060469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Yazigi A; Khoury E; Hlais S; Madi-Jebara S; Haddad F; Hayek G; Jabbour K
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Jun; 26(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 22100211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictor of fluid responsiveness in the 'grey zone': augmented pulse pressure variation through a temporary increase in tidal volume.
    Min JJ; Gil NS; Lee JH; Ryu DK; Kim CS; Lee SM
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Jul; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 28974059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.
    Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
    Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Respirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease.
    Song Y; Kwak YL; Song JW; Kim YJ; Shim JK
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jul; 113(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 24722322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation Are Not Useful for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Thoracic Surgery.
    Jeong DM; Ahn HJ; Park HW; Yang M; Kim JA; Park J
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1158-1165. PubMed ID: 28504996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulse pressure variation is not a valid predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressure.
    Shim JK; Song JW; Song Y; Kim JH; Kang HM; Kwak YL
    J Crit Care; 2014 Dec; 29(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 25216949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
    Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.