These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28207576)
1. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users. Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants. Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes and Electrophysiological Measures of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential. Skidmore J; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y; He S Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1485-1497. PubMed ID: 37194125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age. Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals. Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants. Hughes ML; Laurello SA Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships Between the Auditory Nerve Sensitivity to Amplitude Modulation, Perceptual Amplitude Modulation Rate Discrimination Sensitivity, and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users. He S; Skidmore J; Koch B; Chatterjee M; Carter BL; Yuan Y Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):371-384. PubMed ID: 36342278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts. Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant. Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users. Kirby B; Brown C; Abbas P; Etler C; O'Brien S Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 22246138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates. Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users. Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: data from human cochlear-implant recipients. Hughes ML; Castioni EE; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):46-57. PubMed ID: 22326590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users. Clay KM; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peripheral and Central Contributions to Cortical Responses in Cochlear Implant Users. Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):430-40. PubMed ID: 25658747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A method to dynamically control unwanted loudness cues when measuring amplitude modulation detection in cochlear implant users. Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Oba S; Başkent D J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():207-12. PubMed ID: 24269251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users. Mussoi BSS; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1328-1344. PubMed ID: 31033701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]