These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28208155)

  • 1. PET/MR in invasive ductal breast cancer: correlation between imaging markers and histological phenotype.
    Catalano OA; Horn GL; Signore A; Iannace C; Lepore M; Vangel M; Luongo A; Catalano M; Lehman C; Salvatore M; Soricelli A; Catana C; Mahmood U; Rosen BR
    Br J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 116(7):893-902. PubMed ID: 28208155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of breast cancer subtypes, based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, with functional imaging parameters from ⁶⁸Ga-RGD PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.
    Yoon HJ; Kang KW; Chun IK; Cho N; Im SA; Jeong S; Lee S; Jung KC; Lee YS; Jeong JM; Lee DS; Chung JK; Moon WK
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Aug; 41(8):1534-43. PubMed ID: 24652232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffusion-weighted imaging and FDG PET/CT: predicting the prognoses with apparent diffusion coefficient values and maximum standardized uptake values in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Choi BB; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Lee JH; Song BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW
    World J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 10():126. PubMed ID: 22741544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of uptake level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer.
    Ueda S; Tsuda H; Asakawa H; Shigekawa T; Fukatsu K; Kondo N; Yamamoto M; Hama Y; Tamura K; Ishida J; Abe Y; Mochizuki H
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 38(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 18407934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using sequential (18)F-FDG PET and MRI: correlation with histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
    Byun BH; Noh WC; Lim I; Lee SS; Cho AR; Park JA; Kim KM; Kim HA; Kim EK; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
    Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Oct; 27(8):720-8. PubMed ID: 23700260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation between Ki-67, ER, PR, Her2/neu, p21, EGFR, and TOP II-α expression in invasive ductal breast cancer patients and correlations with prognosis.
    Yan J; Liu XL; Han LZ; Xiao G; Li NL; Deng YN; Yin LC; Ling LJ; Yu XY; Tan CL; Huang XP; Liu LX
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(2):823-9. PubMed ID: 25684532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usefulness of 18F-FDG uptake with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic factors in breast cancer.
    Kim BS; Sung SH
    Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Feb; 26(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 22139552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
    Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic significance of preoperative
    Higuchi T; Nishimukai A; Ozawa H; Fujimoto Y; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():5-12. PubMed ID: 27569020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
    Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metabolic activity of breast cancer metastatic lesions on positron emission tomography/computed tomography: comparison with histological and biological characteristics of primary tumor.
    Sobic Saranovic D; Stojiljkovic M; Susnjar S; Odalovic S; Artiko V; Pavlovic S; Grozdic-Milojevic I; Obradovic V
    Neoplasma; 2016; 63(2):313-21. PubMed ID: 26774154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrated PET/MR mammography for quantitative analysis and correlation to prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Kong E; Chun KA; Bae YK; Cho IH
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 62(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 26784940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography and Clinicopathological Features in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.
    Ito M; Shien T; Kaji M; Mizoo T; Iwamoto T; Nogami T; Motoki T; Taira N; Doihara H; Miyoshi S
    Acta Med Okayama; 2015; 69(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 26690243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective Correlation of Prognostic Immunohistochemical Markers With SUV and ADC Derived From Dedicated Hybrid Breast 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Morawitz J; Kirchner J; Martin O; Bruckmann NM; Dietzel F; Li Y; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Bittner AK; Mohrmann S; Ingenwerth M; Häberle L; Esposito I; Antoch G; Buchbender C; Sawicki LM
    Clin Nucl Med; 2021 Mar; 46(3):201-205. PubMed ID: 33351505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FDG uptake reflects breast cancer immunological features: the PD-L1 expression and degree of TILs in primary breast cancer.
    Hirakata T; Fujii T; Kurozumi S; Katayama A; Honda C; Yanai K; Tokuda S; Nakazawa Y; Obayashi S; Yajima R; Kaira K; Oyama T; Shirabe K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(2):331-338. PubMed ID: 32253685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The correlation of
    Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 18F-FDG semi-quantitative parameters and biological prognostic factors in locally advanced breast cancer.
    García Vicente AM; Soriano Castrejón A; Relea Calatayud F; Muñoz Madero V; Molina Garrido MJ; León Martín AA; Cordero García JM; Pilkington Woll JP; Chacón López-Muñiz I; Palomar Muñoz A
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2012; 31(6):308-14. PubMed ID: 23084013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces the expression rates of ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, and P53 of invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Peng JH; Zhang X; Song JL; Ran L; Luo R; Li HY; Wang YH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(2):e13554. PubMed ID: 30633152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association among T2 signal intensity, necrosis, ADC and Ki-67 in estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Kim SY; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Koo JS; Kim SG; Kim MJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 54():176-182. PubMed ID: 30172938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.