BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28209163)

  • 1. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting.
    Morais P; Marchi A; Bogaert JA; Dresselaers T; Heyde B; D'hooge J; Bogaert J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Feb; 19(1):24. PubMed ID: 28209163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress.
    Schuster A; Kutty S; Padiyath A; Parish V; Gribben P; Danford DA; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Oct; 13(1):58. PubMed ID: 21992220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment: Are CMR feature-tracking algorithms useful in the clinical setting?
    Pierpaolo P; Rolf S; Manuel BP; Davide C; Dresselaers T; Claus P; Bogaert J
    Radiol Med; 2020 May; 125(5):444-450. PubMed ID: 32125636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain.
    Cao JJ; Ngai N; Duncanson L; Cheng J; Gliganic K; Chen Q
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 29669563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of extracellular contrast agent (Gadobutrol) on the precision and reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking.
    Kuetting DL; Dabir D; Homsi R; Sprinkart AM; Luetkens J; Schild HH; Thomas DK
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 May; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 27209219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The intra-observer reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength.
    Schuster A; Morton G; Hussain ST; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Asrress KN; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Perera D; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 23246014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking in small animals - a preliminary study on reproducibility and sample size calculation.
    Lapinskas T; Grune J; Zamani SM; Jeuthe S; Messroghli D; Gebker R; Meyborg H; Kintscher U; Zaliunas R; Pieske B; Stawowy P; Kelle S
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Aug; 17(1):51. PubMed ID: 28835220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age- and gender-related normal left ventricular deformation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking.
    Andre F; Steen H; Matheis P; Westkott M; Breuninger K; Sander Y; Kammerer R; Galuschky C; Giannitsis E; Korosoglou G; Katus HA; Buss SJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Mar; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 25890093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of left atrial strain and strain rate using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance myocardial feature tracking: a feasibility study.
    Kowallick JT; Kutty S; Edelmann F; Chiribiri A; Villa A; Steinmetz M; Sohns JM; Staab W; Bettencourt N; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Hasenfuß G; Lotz J; Schuster A
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Aug; 16(1):60. PubMed ID: 25196447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender.
    Augustine D; Lewandowski AJ; Lazdam M; Rai A; Francis J; Myerson S; Noble A; Becher H; Neubauer S; Petersen SE; Leeson P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Jan; 15(1):8. PubMed ID: 23331550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reference ranges for three-dimensional feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance: comparison with two-dimensional methodology and relevance of age and gender.
    Liu B; Dardeer AM; Moody WE; Hayer MK; Baig S; Price AM; Leyva F; Edwards NC; Steeds RP
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 34(5):761-775. PubMed ID: 29181827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of myocardial deformation by deformable registration-based analysis of cine MRI: validation with tagged CMR.
    Lamacie MM; Houbois CP; Greiser A; Jolly MP; Thavendiranathan P; Wintersperger BJ
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3658-3668. PubMed ID: 30770973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The consistency of myocardial strain derived from heart deformation analysis.
    Keller EJ; Fang S; Lin K; Freed BH; Smith PM; Spottiswoode BS; Davids R; Carr M; Jolly MP; Markl M; Carr JC; Collins JD
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1169-1177. PubMed ID: 28239799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards standardized postprocessing of global longitudinal strain by feature tracking - OptiStrain CMR-FT study.
    Heinke R; Pathan F; Le M; D'Angelo T; Winau L; Arendt C; Vogl TJ; Zeiher A; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Nov; 19(1):267. PubMed ID: 31775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
    Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature tracking CMR reveals abnormal strain in preclinical arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/ cardiomyopathy: a multisoftware feasibility and clinical implementation study.
    Bourfiss M; Vigneault DM; Aliyari Ghasebeh M; Murray B; James CA; Tichnell C; Mohamed Hoesein FA; Zimmerman SL; Kamel IR; Calkins H; Tandri H; Velthuis BK; Bluemke DA; Te Riele ASJM
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Sep; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 28863780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking.
    Morton G; Schuster A; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):43. PubMed ID: 22721175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of myocardial strain in patients with isolated left ventricular non-compaction and healthy subjects using deformable registration algorithm: comparison with feature tracking.
    Liu J; Li Y; Cui Y; Cao Y; Yao S; Zhou X; Wetzl J; Zeng W; Shi H
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Sep; 20(1):400. PubMed ID: 32883201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Wu L; Germans T; Güçlü A; Heymans MW; Allaart CP; van Rossum AC
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 24450803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of Biventricular Myocardial Strain Using CMR Feature Tracking: Reproducibility in Small Animals.
    Li H; Qu Y; Metze P; Sommerfeld F; Just S; Abaei A; Rasche V
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():8492705. PubMed ID: 33553431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.