515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28209184)
1. Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height.
Sartorius B; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Feb; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FemoSeal
Gabrielli R; Rosati MS; Millarelli M; Dante A; Maiorano M; Musilli A; Chiappa R; Ventura M
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 51():18-24. PubMed ID: 29678650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture in Women.
Gewalt SM; Helde SM; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Hoppe K; Ott I; Hieber J; Morath T; Byrne RA; Kufner S; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Fusaro M; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Schüpke S;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 11(8):e006074. PubMed ID: 30354782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship Between Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Short-Term Mortality From 271 845 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures Performed in the United Kingdom Between 2006 and 2011: A Propensity Score-Corrected Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.
Farooq V; Goedhart D; Ludman P; de Belder MA; Harcombe A; El-Omar M;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27225421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prophylactic Retrograde Distal Common Femoral Access as a Bail-out Strategy in Patients with Increased Risk for Femoral Access Complication During Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.
Sanghvi K; Swarup S; Burns P; Kovach R; Ross R; Soussa T
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):481-485. PubMed ID: 31375463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: experience with 1889 interventions for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients.
Lupattelli T; Tannouri F; Garaci FG; Papa G; Pangos M; Somalvico F; Caravaggi C; Faglia E
J Endovasc Ther; 2010 Jun; 17(3):366-75. PubMed ID: 20557177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suitability of a 7-F ExoSeal Vascular Closure Device for Femoral Artery Punctures Made by 8-F or 9-F Introducer Sheaths.
Goto S; Ohshima T; Ishikawa K; Yamamoto T; Nishizawa T; Shimato S; Kato K
J Endovasc Ther; 2017 Aug; 24(4):516-520. PubMed ID: 28743227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of Arterial Closure Devices for Preventing Complications With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.
Wimmer NJ; Secemsky EA; Mauri L; Roe MT; Saha-Chaudhuri P; Dai D; McCabe JM; Resnic FS; Gurm HS; Yeh RW
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(4):e003464. PubMed ID: 27059685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial).
Wong SC; Bachinsky W; Cambier P; Stoler R; Aji J; Rogers JH; Hermiller J; Nair R; Hutman H; Wang H;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):785-93. PubMed ID: 19695549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multicenter randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a novel vascular closure device to manual compression in anticoagulated patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral procedures: The CELT ACD trial.
Wong SC; Laule M; Turi Z; Sanad W; Crowley J; Degen H; Bennett K; Coleman JE; Bergman G
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):756-765. PubMed ID: 28296003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and Efficacy of Arterial Closure Devices Following Antegrade Femoral Access: A Case-Control Study.
Barrette LX; Vance AZ; Mantell MP; Kratz KM; Redmond JW; Clark TWI
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2020 Oct; 54(7):612-617. PubMed ID: 32721190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.
Klein-Wiele O; Baliota M; Kara K; Käunicke M; Schäfer H; Garbrecht M; Abdulghafor M; Garmer M; Hailer B
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 28500743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.
Fastner C; Behnes M; Ünsal M; El-Battrawy I; Ansari U; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Kuschyk J; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Heart Vessels; 2017 May; 32(5):520-530. PubMed ID: 27803954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femoral access-related complications during percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation comparing single versus double Prostar XL device closure.
Saleh N; De Palma R; Settergren M; Rück A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 86(7):1255-61. PubMed ID: 26332528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative data of single versus double proglide vascular preclose technique after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation from the optimized catheter valvular intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) japanese multicenter registry.
Kodama A; Yamamoto M; Shimura T; Kagase A; Koyama Y; Tada N; Takagi K; Araki M; Yamanaka F; Shirai S; Watanabe Y; Hayashida K
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):E55-E62. PubMed ID: 27785881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous Plug-Based Arteriotomy Closure Device for Large-Bore Access: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Van Mieghem NM; Latib A; van der Heyden J; van Gils L; Daemen J; Sorzano T; Ligthart J; Witberg K; de Kroon T; Maor N; Mangieri A; Montorfano M; de Jaegere PP; Colombo A; Roubin G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(6):613-619. PubMed ID: 28335899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FemoSeal
Tagliaferro FB; Orgera G; Mascagni L; Laurino F; Tipaldi MA; Cariati M; Rossi M
J Vasc Access; 2020 Jan; 21(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 31232151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
