These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28210038)

  • 1. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints.
    In TS; Jung JH; Kim K; Jung KS; Cho HY
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2017 Jan; 29(1):53-56. PubMed ID: 28210038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.
    In TS; Jung JH; Kim KJ; Lee CR; Jung KS; Cho HY
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2017 Jun; 29(6):1062-1065. PubMed ID: 28626325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Foot Function Index.
    Huh JW; Eun IS; Ko YC; Park MJ; Hwang KM; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(4):759-61. PubMed ID: 27067199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the spine functional index.
    In TS
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2017 Jun; 29(6):1082-1084. PubMed ID: 28626330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the lower limb functional index.
    In TS; Jung JH; Jung KS; Cho HY
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2018 Jan; 30(1):50-52. PubMed ID: 29410565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Foot Function Index.
    Wu SH; Liang HW; Hou WH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Feb; 107(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 18285243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.
    Kim JB; Kim JK; Seo SG; Lee DY
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 25441847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.
    Jung KS; Jung JH; Jang SH; Bang HS; In TS
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2017 Jul; 29(7):1250-1253. PubMed ID: 28744058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot disorders.
    Anaforoğlu Külünkoğlu B; Fırat N; Yıldız NT; Alkan A
    Turk J Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 48(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 29914240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Foot and Ankle Disability Index.
    Eun IS; Oh YS; Kim J; Jang W
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2024; 63(1):33-35. PubMed ID: 37604317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Korean Version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire in Patients With Hallux Valgus.
    Park MJ; Ko YC; Huh JW; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):252-254. PubMed ID: 28231961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle: The Turkish Version.
    Gur G; Turgut E; Dilek B; Baltaci G; Bek N; Yakut Y
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(6):1213-1217. PubMed ID: 28864388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire Brazilian-Portuguese version.
    Martinez BR; Staboli IM; Kamonseki DH; Budiman-Mak E; Yi LC
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1810. PubMed ID: 27812449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thai version of the foot function index: a cross-cultural adaptation with reliability and validity evaluation.
    Bovonsunthonchai S; Thong-On S; Vachalathiti R; Intiravoranont W; Suwannarat S; Smith R
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2020; 12():56. PubMed ID: 32944253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability.
    Anaforoglu Kulunkoglu B; Celik D
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jan; 58(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 30448187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders.
    Mazaheri M; Salavati M; Negahban H; Sohani SM; Taghizadeh F; Feizi A; Karimi A; Parnianpour M
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2010 Jun; 18(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 20338253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle.
    Angthong C
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Korean version of the oswestry disability index.
    Kim DY; Lee SH; Lee HY; Lee HJ; Chang SB; Chung SK; Kim HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(5):E123-7. PubMed ID: 15738775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcultural adaptation and validation of a Korean version of the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for children.
    Cho SH; Chung CY; Park MS; Lee KM; Sung KH
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 May; 18(1):118. PubMed ID: 32357937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
    Çelik D; Malkoç M; Martin R
    Rheumatol Int; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1469-76. PubMed ID: 27136921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.