These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28211178)

  • 1. What is the appropriate gold standard test for refractive error?
    Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):115-117. PubMed ID: 28211178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Macular illumination tests in various refractive states of the eye.
    Paul SD; Singh K
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1971 Sep; 19(3):102-7. PubMed ID: 15744979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Report from the VSIA taskforce on standards for reporting optical aberrations of the eye.
    Thibos LN; Applegate RA; Schwiegerling JT; Webb R
    J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(5):S654-5. PubMed ID: 11019893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent advances in measurement of monochromatic aberrations of human eyes.
    Atchison DA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Jan; 88(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 15658922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children?
    Howard C; Firth AY
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 16909076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-order aberrations in pseudophakia with different IOLs.
    Cheng AC; Lam DS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):867; author reply 867-8. PubMed ID: 15975439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes.
    Thibos LN; Applegate RA; Schwiegerling JT; Webb R;
    J Refract Surg; 2002; 18(5):S652-60. PubMed ID: 12361175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Errors in the prediction of postoperative refraction following intraocular lens implantation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome.
    Ishikawa N; Hayashi Y; Miyamoto T; Saika S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(4):649-50. PubMed ID: 23522588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Traditional versus computer-assisted refraction: "which is better?".
    Borish IM; Catania LJ
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):749-56. PubMed ID: 9635380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
    Sachdev N; Cairns G; McGhee CN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):9; author reply 9-10. PubMed ID: 15630398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference axis selection: subcommittee report of the OSA Working Group to establish standards for measurement and reporting of optical aberrations of the eye.
    Applegate RA; Thibos LN; Bradley A; Marcos S; Roorda A; Salmon TO; Atchison DA
    J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(5):S656-8. PubMed ID: 11019894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refractive error and preferential looking visual acuity in human infants: a pilot study.
    Kohl P; Rolen RD; Bedford AK; Samek M; Stern N
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Apr; 57(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 3700952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Refractive error in premature infants.
    Ton Y; Wysenbeek YS; Spierer A
    J AAPOS; 2004 Dec; 8(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 15616500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncorrected visual acuity and noncycloplegic autorefraction predict significant refractive errors in Taiwanese preschool children.
    Lai YH; Tseng HY; Hsu HT; Chang SJ; Wang HZ
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Feb; 120(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 23182455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective refraction from monochromatic wavefront aberrations via Zernike power polynomials.
    Robert Iskander D; Davis BA; Collins MJ; Franklin R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 17470237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of an open-field autorefractor's ability to measure refraction and hence potential to assess objective accommodation in pseudophakes.
    Wolffsohn JS; Davies LN; Naroo SA; Buckhurst PJ; Gibson GA; Gupta N; Craig JP; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 95(4):498-501. PubMed ID: 20657018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control and consideration of wavefront aberrometers.
    Montés-Micó R; Muñoz G; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):942. PubMed ID: 15130619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.