These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28211180)

  • 1. Slope of psychometric functions and termination rule analysis for low contrast acuity charts.
    Carkeet A; Bailey IL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 28211180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The slope of the psychometric function for Bailey-Lovie letter charts: defocus effects and implications for modeling letter-by-letter scores.
    Carkeet A; Lee L; Kerr JR; Keung MM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 78(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 11265926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: effects of termination rules and alternative forced-choice options.
    Carkeet A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Jul; 78(7):529-38. PubMed ID: 11503943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement.
    Carkeet A; Lister LJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 29280165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 9156226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of an Automated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Low-contrast Letter Acuity Test.
    Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E; Wang J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):370-376. PubMed ID: 32413009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
    Cho P; Woo GC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distance word acuity, critical print size and driving vision standards.
    Rae S; Latham K; Katsou MF
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 26390909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule.
    Hazel CA; Elliott DB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 79(12):788-92. PubMed ID: 12512687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of contrast sensitivity of patients with macular disease using reduced contrast near visual acuity charts.
    Greeves AL; Cole BL; Jacobs RJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 3253627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
    Rabin J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability of mesopic visual acuity measurements using high- and low-contrast ETDRS letter charts.
    Barrio A; Antona B; Puell MC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 253(5):791-5. PubMed ID: 25488572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual acuity loss in patients with age-related macular degeneration measured using a novel high-pass letter chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Dobinson S; Tufail A; Egan CA; Anderson RS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 100(10):1346-52. PubMed ID: 26846435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normative reference ranges for binocular summation as a function of age for low contrast letter charts.
    Pineles SL; Velez FG; Yu F; Demer JL; Birch E
    Strabismus; 2014 Dec; 22(4):167-75. PubMed ID: 25283818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The accuracy of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.
    Felius J; Wang YZ; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):406-12. PubMed ID: 14730293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual acuity scored by the letter-by-letter or probit methods has lower retest variability than the line assignment method.
    Vanden Bosch ME; Wall M
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 3)():411-7. PubMed ID: 9373488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.