BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28211806)

  • 1. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
    Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
    Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis.
    Fontaine M; Tourasse C; Pages E; Laurent N; Laffargue G; Millet I; Molinari N; Taourel P
    Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30964425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of the Diagnostic Values of Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,and Digital Mammography for Early Breast Cancer].
    Xu AQ; Weng XB; Zheng J; Li ZQ; Wang XL; Zhang SJ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2019 Oct; 41(5):667-672. PubMed ID: 31699198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study.
    Rafferty EA; Park JM; Philpotts LE; Poplack SP; Sumkin JH; Halpern EF; Niklason LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 24450665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
    Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?
    Mall S; Noakes J; Kossoff M; Lee W; McKessar M; Goy A; Duncombe J; Roberts M; Giuffre B; Miller A; Bhola N; Kapoor C; Shearman C; DaCosta G; Choi S; Sterba J; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Donohue K; Macdonell-Scott B; Klijnsma F; Suzuki K; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5182-5194. PubMed ID: 29846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of Breast MRI for Further Evaluation of Equivocal Findings on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Niell BL; Bhatt K; Dang P; Humphrey K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 30207789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more?
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Gubern-Merida A; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Lång K; Dustler M; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1938-1948. PubMed ID: 29230524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
    Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of breast tomosynthesis in a predominantly dense breast population at a tertiary breast centre: breast density assessment and diagnostic performance in comparison with MRI.
    Förnvik D; Kataoka M; Iima M; Ohashi A; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3194-3203. PubMed ID: 29460074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefit of digital breast tomosynthesis in symptomatic young women (≤30 years) diagnosed with BI-RADS category 4 or 5 on ultrasound.
    Huang JL; Lin Q
    Clin Radiol; 2022 Jan; 77(1):e55-e63. PubMed ID: 34763818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography for Detection of Breast Cancer in Kuwaiti Women.
    Asbeutah AM; Karmani N; Asbeutah AA; Echreshzadeh YA; AlMajran AA; Al-Khalifah KH
    Med Princ Pract; 2019; 28(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 30476905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.