BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28211806)

  • 21. Synthetic 2-Dimensional Mammography Can Replace Digital Mammography as an Adjunct to Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Feb; 54(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30281557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
    Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
    Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
    Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.
    Kuhl CK; Keulers A; Strobel K; Schneider H; Gaisa N; Schrading S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 29426360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Mariscotti G; Houssami N; Durando M; Bergamasco L; Campanino PP; Ruggieri C; Regini E; Luparia A; Bussone R; Sapino A; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Mar; 34(3):1219-25. PubMed ID: 24596363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improvement in diagnostic performance of breast cancer: comparison between conventional digital mammography alone and conventional mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Ohashi R; Nagao M; Nakamura I; Okamoto T; Sakai S
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Sep; 25(5):590-596. PubMed ID: 29651638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.
    Ray S; Chen L; Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alabousi M; Zha N; Salameh JP; Samoilov L; Sharifabadi AD; Pozdnyakov A; Sadeghirad B; Freitas V; McInnes MDF; Alabousi A
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):2058-2071. PubMed ID: 31900699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.
    Roganovic D; Djilas D; Vujnovic S; Pavic D; Stojanov D
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2015 Nov; 15(4):64-8. PubMed ID: 26614855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
    Amer HA; Schmitzberger F; Ingold-Heppner B; Kussmaul J; El Tohamy MF; Tantawy HI; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fallenberg EM
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():258-264. PubMed ID: 28668424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of disease extent on contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer detected at digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography alone.
    Chudgar AV; Conant EF; Weinstein SP; Keller BM; Synnestvedt M; Yamartino P; McDonald ES
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jul; 72(7):573-579. PubMed ID: 28318506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis.
    Lei J; Yang P; Zhang L; Wang Y; Yang K
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):595-602. PubMed ID: 24121712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Kim GR; Ko ES; Park KW
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):319-329. PubMed ID: 29931560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, automated breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Park J; Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Choi YW; Kim HH
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():261-268. PubMed ID: 30396666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus MRI as an Adjunct to Full-Field Digital Mammography for Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer according to Mammographic Density.
    Kim H; Yang SY; Ahn JH; Ko EY; Ko ES; Han BK; Choi JS
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 36126953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction.
    Endo T; Morita T; Oiwa M; Suda N; Sato Y; Ichihara S; Shiraiwa M; Yoshikawa K; Horiba T; Ogawa H; Hayashi Y; Sendai T; Arai T
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28956298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.