BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

843 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28211807)

  • 1. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Comparison of two different systems.
    Ren WW; Li XL; He YP; Li DD; Wang D; Zhao CK; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Yue WW; Xu HX
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 28211807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
    Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
    Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of shear-wave elastography and color Doppler: Feasible method to avoid unnecessary breast excision of fibroepithelial lesions diagnosed by core needle biopsy.
    Kim GR; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Hahn SY
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0175380. PubMed ID: 28472030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of 2D-shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a clinical appraisal of cutoff values.
    Bartolotta TV; Orlando AAM; Dimarco M; Zarcaro C; Ferraro F; Cirino A; Matranga D; Vieni S; Cabibi D
    Radiol Med; 2022 Nov; 127(11):1209-1220. PubMed ID: 36114930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography with two different systems for the diagnosis of breast lesions.
    Yu JF; Zhang S; Yin HH; Zhou BG; Pu YY; Fang Y; Du D; Zhang Y; Xu HX
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2022; 82(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 35599476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative evaluation of tissue stiffness around lesion by sound touch elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Huang L; Ma M; Du Z; Liu Z; Gong X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219943. PubMed ID: 31318932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Qualitative and quantitative analysis with a novel shear wave speed imaging for differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
    Yang YP; Xu XH; Guo LH; He YP; Wang D; Liu BJ; Zhao CK; Chen BD; Xu HX
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40964. PubMed ID: 28102328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of 3D and 2D quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses.
    Tian J; Liu Q; Wang X; Xing P; Yang Z; Wu C
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():41216. PubMed ID: 28106134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear-Wave Elastography of the Breast: Impact of Technical Image Quality Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Chou SS; Baikpour M; Zhang W; Mercaldo SF; Lehman CD; Samir AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1205-1215. PubMed ID: 33729888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First experience of comparisons between two different shear wave speed imaging systems in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.
    He YP; Xu HX; Wang D; Li XL; Ren WW; Zhao CK; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Yue WW
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 65(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 27983544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of region of interest (ROI) size on the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in differentiating solid breast lesions.
    Moon JH; Hwang JY; Park JS; Koh SH; Park SY
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Jun; 59(6):657-663. PubMed ID: 28899126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast Elasticity Imaging Techniques: Comparison of Strain Elastography and Shear-Wave Elastography in the Same Population.
    Jia W; Luo T; Dong Y; Zhang X; Zhan W; Zhou J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 47(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 33109379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can measuring perilesional tissue stiffness and stiff rim sign improve the diagnostic performance between benign and malignant breast lesions?
    Kong WT; Wang Y; Zhou WJ; Zhang YD; Wang WP; Zhuang XM; Wu M
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 33439373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses.
    Lee EJ; Chang YW
    Korean J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 32691540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative Elastography of Rectal Lesions: The Value ofShear Wave Elastography in Identifying Benign and Malignant Rectal Lesions.
    Li T; Lu M; Li Y; Li J; Hu Z; Li X; Cheng X; Jiang J; Tan B
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 30342780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions.
    Altıntas Y; Bayrak M; Alabaz Ö; Celiktas M
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 33070635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of shear-wave elastography for breast masses using different region-of-interest (ROI) settings.
    Youk JH; Son EJ; Han K; Gweon HM; Kim JA
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul; 59(7):789-797. PubMed ID: 29058962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasound shear wave elastography of breast lesions: correlation of anisotropy with clinical and histopathological findings.
    Chen YL; Gao Y; Chang C; Wang F; Zeng W; Chen JJ
    Cancer Imaging; 2018 Apr; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29622044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.