These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28211839)

  • 1. Use of speech generating devices can improve perception of qualifications for skilled, verbal, and interactive jobs.
    Stern SE; Chobany CM; Beam AA; Hoover BN; Hull TT; Linsenbigler M; Makdad-Light C; Rubright CN
    Work; 2017; 56(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 28211839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech-language pathologists' views on mentoring by people who use speech generating devices.
    Ballin L; Balandin S; Stancliffe RJ; Togher L
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Oct; 13(5):446-57. PubMed ID: 20969497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Undergraduates' perceptions of three augmentative and alternative communication modes.
    Achmadi D; van der Meer L; Sigafoos J; Lancioni GE; O'Reilly MF; Lang R; Schlosser RW; Hodis F; Green VA; Sutherland D; McLay L; Marschik PB
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2015 Feb; 18(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 25279968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using robots in "Hands-on" academic activities: a case study examining speech-generating device use and required skills.
    Adams K; Cook A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):433-43. PubMed ID: 25495803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A wearable fabric-based speech-generating device: system design and case demonstration.
    Fleury A; Wu G; Chau T
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Jul; 14(5):434-444. PubMed ID: 29804479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A qualitative metasynthesis of the meaning of speech-generating devices for people with complex communication needs.
    Ripat J; Verdonck M; Gacek C; McNicol S
    Augment Altern Commun; 2019 Jun; 35(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 30231653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech and language pathologists' perceptions and practises of communication partner training to support children's communication with high-tech speech generating devices.
    Tegler H; Pless M; Blom Johansson M; Sonnander K
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Aug; 14(6):581-589. PubMed ID: 29790394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A large-scale comparison of two voice synthesis techniques on intelligibility, naturalness, preferences, and attitudes toward voices banked by individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
    Hyppa-Martin J; Lilley J; Chen M; Friese J; Schmidt C; Bunnell HT
    Augment Altern Commun; 2024 Mar; 40(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 37791834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of perceived disability on persuasiveness of computer-synthesized speech.
    Stern SE; Mullennix JW; Wilson SJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 12002967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Access to hands-on mathematics measurement activities using robots controlled via speech generating devices: three case studies.
    Adams K; Cook A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):286-98. PubMed ID: 23957389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Listeners' preference for computer-synthesized speech over natural speech of people with disabilities.
    Stern SE; Chobany CM; Patel DV; Tressler JJ
    Rehabil Psychol; 2014 Aug; 59(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 25133904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performing mathematics activities with non-standard units of measurement using robots controlled via speech-generating devices: three case studies.
    Adams KD; Cook AM
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Jul; 12(5):491-503. PubMed ID: 26978274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids.
    Judge S; Townend G
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(4):366-81. PubMed ID: 23889833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of speech-generating devices on the language development of a child with childhood apraxia of speech: a case study.
    Lüke C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 24773213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of picture exchange and speech-generating devices: acquisition, preference, and effects on social interaction.
    Sigafoos J; Green VA; Payne D; Son SH; O'Reilly M; Lancioni GE
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Jun; 25(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 19444681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "It's got to be more than that". Parents and speech-language pathologists discuss training content for families with a new speech generating device.
    Anderson KL; Balandin S; Stancliffe RJ
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 25260118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech generating devices and modality of short-term word storage.
    Dukhovny E; Soto G
    Augment Altern Commun; 2013 Sep; 29(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 23927389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synthetic and natural speech preferences of male and female listeners in four age groups.
    Mirenda P; Eicher D; Beukelman DR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 2523007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The speech-generating device (SGD) mentoring program: training adults who use an SGD to mentor.
    Ballin L; Balandin S; Stancliffe RJ
    Augment Altern Commun; 2012 Dec; 28(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 23256857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction of participant characteristics and type of AAC with individuals with ASD: a meta-analysis.
    Ganz JB; Mason RA; Goodwyn FD; Boles MB; Heath AK; Davis JL
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 119(6):516-35. PubMed ID: 25354122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.