These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28211943)

  • 1. A general statistical framework for subgroup identification and comparative treatment scoring.
    Chen S; Tian L; Cai T; Yu M
    Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1199-1209. PubMed ID: 28211943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating optimal treatment regimes via subgroup identification in randomized control trials and observational studies.
    Fu H; Zhou J; Faries DE
    Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(19):3285-302. PubMed ID: 26892174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Studying treatment-effect heterogeneity in precision medicine through induced subgroups.
    Sies A; Demyttenaere K; Van Mechelen I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):491-507. PubMed ID: 30794033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects.
    Xu Y; Yu M; Zhao YQ; Li Q; Wang S; Shao J
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 25962845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment decisions based on scalar and functional baseline covariates.
    Ciarleglio A; Petkova E; Ogden RT; Tarpey T
    Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):884-94. PubMed ID: 26111145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicategory individualized treatment regime using outcome weighted learning.
    Huang X; Goldberg Y; Xu J
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1216-1227. PubMed ID: 31095722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced precision in the analysis of randomized trials with ordinal outcomes.
    Díaz I; Colantuoni E; Rosenblum M
    Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 26576013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies.
    Gutman R; Rubin DB
    Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(26):3381-98. PubMed ID: 26013308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tutorial in biostatistics: data-driven subgroup identification and analysis in clinical trials.
    Lipkovich I; Dmitrienko A; B R
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):136-196. PubMed ID: 27488683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bagging and deep learning in optimal individualized treatment rules.
    Mi X; Zou F; Zhu R
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 30365175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating effectiveness of subgroup identification for longitudinal data.
    Andrews N; Cho H
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 28948635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust regression for optimal individualized treatment rules.
    Xiao W; Zhang HH; Lu W
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(11):2059-2073. PubMed ID: 30740747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying predictive markers for personalized treatment selection.
    Shen Y; Cai T
    Biometrics; 2016 Dec; 72(4):1017-1025. PubMed ID: 26999054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A general framework for subgroup detection via one-step value difference estimation.
    Johnson D; Lu W; Davidian M
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2116-2126. PubMed ID: 35793474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
    Hong G
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of subgroup identification methods for differential treatment effect: Performance metrics and recommendations.
    Alemayehu D; Chen Y; Markatou M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3658-3678. PubMed ID: 28629264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalized propensity score for estimating the average treatment effect of multiple treatments.
    Feng P; Zhou XH; Zou QM; Fan MY; Li XS
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(7):681-97. PubMed ID: 21351291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reward ignorant modeling of dynamic treatment regimes.
    Wallace MP; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):991-1002. PubMed ID: 29845644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.