These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28212945)

  • 21. Interval timing in genetically modified mice: a simple paradigm.
    Balci F; Papachristos EB; Gallistel CR; Brunner D; Gibson J; Shumyatsky GP
    Genes Brain Behav; 2008 Apr; 7(3):373-84. PubMed ID: 17696995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network.
    Coull JT; Nazarian B; Vidal F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2185-97. PubMed ID: 18457512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interval timing accuracy and scalar timing in C57BL/6 mice.
    Buhusi CV; Aziz D; Winslow D; Carter RE; Swearingen JE; Buhusi MC
    Behav Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 123(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 19824777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Working memory and auditory imagery predict sensorimotor synchronisation with expressively timed music.
    Colley ID; Keller PE; Halpern AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1781-1796. PubMed ID: 28797209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Opposing influences of emotional and non-emotional distracters upon sustained prefrontal cortex activity during a delayed-response working memory task.
    Dolcos F; Diaz-Granados P; Wang L; McCarthy G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):326-35. PubMed ID: 17765933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Time-sharing in pigeons: Independent effects of gap duration, position and discriminability from the timed signal.
    Buhusi CV; Paskalis JP; Cerutti DT
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):116-25. PubMed ID: 16414210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time flies faster if a person has a high working-memory capacity.
    Woehrle JL; Magliano JP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):314-9. PubMed ID: 22246199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors on temporal discrimination by mice.
    Halberstadt AL; Sindhunata IS; Scheffers K; Flynn AD; Sharp RF; Geyer MA; Young JW
    Neuropharmacology; 2016 Aug; 107():364-375. PubMed ID: 27020041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative genetics of age-related retinal degeneration: a second F1 intercross between the A/J and C57BL/6 strains.
    Danciger M; Yang H; Ralston R; Liu Y; Matthes MT; Peirce J; Lavail MM
    Mol Vis; 2007 Jan; 13():79-85. PubMed ID: 17277741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Timing variability in circle drawing and tapping: probing the relationship between event and emergent timing.
    Zelaznik HN; Spencer RM; Ivry RB; Baria A; Bloom M; Dolansky L; Justice S; Patterson K; Whetter E
    J Mot Behav; 2005 Sep; 37(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16120566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes in fMRI BOLD response to increasing and decreasing task difficulty during auditory perception of temporal order.
    Lewandowska M; Piatkowska-Janko E; Bogorodzki P; Wolak T; Szelag E
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2010 Oct; 94(3):382-91. PubMed ID: 20736075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gender differences in emotion recognition: Impact of sensory modality and emotional category.
    Lambrecht L; Kreifelts B; Wildgruber D
    Cogn Emot; 2014 Apr; 28(3):452-69. PubMed ID: 24151963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.
    Han SW
    Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28871460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention and working memory deficits in a perinatal nicotine exposure mouse model.
    Zhang L; Spencer TJ; Biederman J; Bhide PG
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0198064. PubMed ID: 29795664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Olfactory or auditory stimulation and their hedonic values differentially modulate visual working memory.
    Donoso AM; Faundes V; Falcón F; Esparza P; Maldonado PE
    Biol Res; 2008; 41(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 19621118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attention and interference in prospective and retrospective timing.
    Brown SW; Stubbs DA
    Perception; 1992; 21(4):545-57. PubMed ID: 1437469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations.
    Yuasa K; Yotsumoto Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135646. PubMed ID: 26292285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Finding the most appropriate mouse model of juvenile CLN3 (Batten) disease for therapeutic studies: the importance of genetic background and gender.
    Kovács AD; Pearce DA
    Dis Model Mech; 2015 Apr; 8(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 26035843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.