BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28213890)

  • 1. Heterogeneity in meta-analyses. Comparing apples and oranges?
    Choi SW; Lam DM
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Apr; 72(4):532-534. PubMed ID: 28213890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heterogeneity: the issue of apples, oranges and fruit pie.
    Purgato M; Adams CE
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2012 Mar; 21(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 22670409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing apples to oranges in meta-analysis studies.
    Rhee JS
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2007; 9(2):139-40; author reply 140-1. PubMed ID: 17372070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analyses of ultrasound-guided versus traditional peripheral nerve block techniques--are we comparing apples and oranges?
    Torrillo TM; Rosenblatt MA
    J Clin Anesth; 2011 Mar; 23(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 21377069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apples, oranges, and placebos: heterogeneity in a meta-analysis of placebo effects.
    Kirsch I; Scoboria A
    Adv Mind Body Med; 2001; 17(4):307-9; discussion 312-8. PubMed ID: 11931056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comment on: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Coory MD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):932; author reply 933. PubMed ID: 19349478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis: Can we mix apples and oranges?
    Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Dec; 99(12):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15571572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heterogeneous views on heterogeneity.
    Patsopoulos NA; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 38(6):1740-2. PubMed ID: 18940836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HELOW: a program for testing extreme homogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Zintzaras E; Ioannidis JP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Nov; 117(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 25023534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.
    Smith CT; Williamson PR; Marson AG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):468-78. PubMed ID: 16164588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Higgins JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1158-60. PubMed ID: 18832388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
    Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses: its magnitude and implications.
    Senior AM; Grueber CE; Kamiya T; Lagisz M; O'Dwyer K; Santos ES; Nakagawa S
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3293-3299. PubMed ID: 27912008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away.
    Sharpe D
    Clin Psychol Rev; 1997 Dec; 17(8):881-901. PubMed ID: 9439872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performing and evaluating meta-analyses.
    Burcharth J; Pommergaard HC; Rosenberg J
    Surgery; 2015 Feb; 157(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 25304841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis: apples and oranges, or fruitless.
    Vatz JB
    Physician Exec; 1991; 17(3):40-2. PubMed ID: 10111673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.
    Huf W; Kalcher K; Pail G; Friedrich ME; Filzmoser P; Kasper S
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 12(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 21375365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of meta-analytic statistical significance testing.
    Polanin JR; Pigott TD
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 26035470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.