306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28214036)
1. Impact of Filling Gas on Subharmonic Emissions of Phospholipid Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Kanbar E; Fouan D; Sennoga CA; Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):1004-1015. PubMed ID: 28214036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The delayed onset of subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions from a phospholipid-shelled microbubble contrast agent.
Shekhar H; Awuor I; Thomas K; Rychak JJ; Doyley MM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):727-38. PubMed ID: 24582298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimisation of the transmit beam parameters for generation of subharmonic signals in native and altered populations of a commercial microbubble contrast agent SonoVue®.
Ivory AM; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():176-183. PubMed ID: 32036334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subharmonic emissions from microbubbles: effect of the driving pulse shape.
Biagi E; Breschi L; Vannacci E; Masotti L
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2174-82. PubMed ID: 17091852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.
Faez T; Renaud G; Defontaine M; Calle S; de Jong N
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6459-73. PubMed ID: 21934190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of encapsulated gas on stability of lipid-based microbubbles and ultrasound-triggered drug delivery.
Omata D; Maruyama T; Unga J; Hagiwara F; Munakata L; Kageyama S; Shima T; Suzuki Y; Maruyama K; Suzuki R
J Control Release; 2019 Oct; 311-312():65-73. PubMed ID: 31461665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterisation of Liposome-Loaded Microbubble Populations for Subharmonic Imaging.
McLaughlan JR; Harput S; Abou-Saleh RH; Peyman SA; Evans S; Freear S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):346-356. PubMed ID: 27789045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ambient Pressure Sensitivity of the Subharmonic Response of Coated Microbubbles: Effects of Acoustic Excitation Parameters.
Azami RH; Forsberg F; Eisenbrey JR; Sarkar K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1550-1560. PubMed ID: 37100673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast microbubbles: theory and in vivo measurements.
Forsberg F; Basude R; Liu JB; Alessandro J; Shi WT; Rawool NM; Goldberg BB; Wheatley MA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 25(8):1203-11. PubMed ID: 10576263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency relationships for ultrasonic activation of free microbubbles, encapsulated microbubbles, and gas-filled micropores.
Miller DL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2498-505. PubMed ID: 10491710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stable and transient subharmonic emissions from isolated contrast agent microbubbles.
Biagi E; Breschi L; Vannacci E; Masotti L
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):480-97. PubMed ID: 17375818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Sijl J; Dollet B; Overvelde M; Garbin V; Rozendal T; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3239-52. PubMed ID: 21110619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transient subharmonic and ultraharmonic acoustic emission during dissolution of free gas bubbles.
Biagi E; Breschi L; Masotti L
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1048-54. PubMed ID: 16118987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subharmonic response of encapsulated microbubbles: conditions for existence and amplification.
Kimmel E; Krasovitski B; Hoogi A; Razansky D; Adam D
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1767-76. PubMed ID: 17720301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of binding on the subharmonic emissions from individual lipid-encapsulated microbubbles at transmit frequencies of 11 and 25 MHz.
Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 39(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 23219039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrafast 2-dimensional image monitoring and array-based passive cavitation detection for ultrasound contrast agent destruction in a variably sized region.
Xu S; Hu H; Jiang H; Xu Z; Wan M
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1957-70. PubMed ID: 25336483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Experimental study on high-frequency subharmonic scattering characteristics of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles under low ambient pressure].
Lu H; Wang Y; Huang L; Xu G; Zhou J; Yu W; Li F
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 40(6):1209-1216. PubMed ID: 38151945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction.
Chomas JE; Dayton P; Allen J; Morgan K; Ferrara KW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Jan; 48(1):232-48. PubMed ID: 11367791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive Pressure Estimation Based on the Subharmonic Response of SonoVue: Application to Intracranial Blood Pressure Assessment.
Qiao X; Wen Y; Yu J; Bouakaz A; Zong Y; Wan M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Mar; 69(3):957-966. PubMed ID: 34941508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
