345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28214393)
1. Flow cytometric bacterial cell counts challenge conventional heterotrophic plate counts for routine microbiological drinking water monitoring.
Van Nevel S; Koetzsch S; Proctor CR; Besmer MD; Prest EI; Vrouwenvelder JS; Knezev A; Boon N; Hammes F
Water Res; 2017 Apr; 113():191-206. PubMed ID: 28214393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flow-cytometric total bacterial cell counts as a descriptive microbiological parameter for drinking water treatment processes.
Hammes F; Berney M; Wang Y; Vital M; Köster O; Egli T
Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):269-77. PubMed ID: 17659762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of biofilm cell quantification methods for drinking water distribution systems.
Waller SA; Packman AI; Hausner M
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():8-21. PubMed ID: 29111400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining flow cytometry and 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing: a promising approach for drinking water monitoring and characterization.
Prest EI; El-Chakhtoura J; Hammes F; Saikaly PE; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():179-89. PubMed ID: 25000200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-Term Bacterial Dynamics in a Full-Scale Drinking Water Distribution System.
Prest EI; Weissbrodt DG; Hammes F; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164445. PubMed ID: 27792739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring microbiological changes in drinking water systems using a fast and reproducible flow cytometric method.
Prest EI; Hammes F; Kötzsch S; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(19):7131-42. PubMed ID: 24183559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid, cultivation-independent assessment of microbial viability in drinking water.
Berney M; Vital M; Hülshoff I; Weilenmann HU; Egli T; Hammes F
Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):4010-8. PubMed ID: 18694583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods for microbiological quality assessment in drinking water: a comparative study.
Helmi K; Barthod F; Méheut G; Henry A; Poty F; Laurent F; Charni-Ben-Tabassi N
J Water Health; 2015 Mar; 13(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25719463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applicability of solid-phase cytometry and epifluorescence microscopy for rapid assessment of the microbiological quality of dialysis water.
Riepl M; Schauer S; Knetsch S; Holzhammer E; Farnleitner AH; Sommer R; Kirschner AK
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Nov; 26(11):3640-5. PubMed ID: 21948860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flow cytometry for immediate follow-up of drinking water networks after maintenance.
Van Nevel S; Buysschaert B; De Roy K; De Gusseme B; Clement L; Boon N
Water Res; 2017 Mar; 111():66-73. PubMed ID: 28043001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A microbiology-based multi-parametric approach towards assessing biological stability in drinking water distribution networks.
Lautenschlager K; Hwang C; Liu WT; Boon N; Köster O; Vrouwenvelder H; Egli T; Hammes F
Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(9):3015-25. PubMed ID: 23557697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating the suitability of online flow cytometry for monitoring full-scale drinking water ozone system disinfection effectiveness.
Dowdell KS; Olsen K; Martinez Paz EF; Sun A; Keown J; Lahr R; Steglitz B; Busch A; LiPuma JJ; Olson T; Raskin L
Water Res; 2024 Jun; 257():121702. PubMed ID: 38749337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological instability in a chlorinated drinking water distribution network.
Nescerecka A; Rubulis J; Vital M; Juhna T; Hammes F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96354. PubMed ID: 24796923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flow cytometry total cell counts: a field study assessing microbiological water quality and growth in unchlorinated drinking water distribution systems.
Liu G; Van der Mark EJ; Verberk JQ; Van Dijk JC
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():595872. PubMed ID: 23819117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting heterotrophic plate count exceedance in tap water: A binary classification model supervised by culture-independent data.
Park JW; Boxall J; Maeng SK
Water Res; 2023 Aug; 242():120172. PubMed ID: 37307683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification and identification of particle-associated bacteria in unchlorinated drinking water from three treatment plants by cultivation-independent methods.
Liu G; Ling FQ; Magic-Knezev A; Liu WT; Verberk JQ; Van Dijk JC
Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3523-33. PubMed ID: 23618316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bacterial dynamics in drinking water distribution systems and flow cytometry monitoring scheme optimization.
Gabrielli M; Turolla A; Antonelli M
J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 286():112151. PubMed ID: 33609931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing flow cytometry with culture-based methods for microbial monitoring and as a diagnostic tool for assessing drinking water treatment processes.
Cheswick R; Cartmell E; Lee S; Upton A; Weir P; Moore G; Nocker A; Jefferson B; Jarvis P
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104893. PubMed ID: 31226555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flow cytometry and adenosine tri-phosphate analysis: alternative possibilities to evaluate major bacteriological changes in drinking water treatment and distribution systems.
Vital M; Dignum M; Magic-Knezev A; Ross P; Rietveld L; Hammes F
Water Res; 2012 Oct; 46(15):4665-76. PubMed ID: 22763289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of Asellus aquaticus on Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Campylobacter jejuni and naturally occurring heterotrophic bacteria in drinking water.
Christensen SC; Nissen E; Arvin E; Albrechtsen HJ
Water Res; 2012 Oct; 46(16):5279-86. PubMed ID: 22884244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
