These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Characteristics of different mesh types for abdominal wall repair in an experimental model of peritonitis. Kaufmann R; Jairam AP; Mulder IM; Wu Z; Verhelst J; Vennix S; Giesen LJX; Clahsen-van Groningen MC; Jeekel J; Lange JF Br J Surg; 2017 Dec; 104(13):1884-1893. PubMed ID: 28901533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair. Chand B; Indeck M; Needleman B; Finnegan M; Van Sickle KR; Ystgaard B; Gossetti F; Pullan RD; Giordano P; McKinley A Int J Surg; 2014; 12(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 24508570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects. Mulier KE; Nguyen AH; Delaney JP; Marquez S Hernia; 2011 Jun; 15(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 21234626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with Permacol™ biologic mesh. Cheng AW; Abbas MA; Tejirian T Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):992-6. PubMed ID: 24160785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complex ventral hernia repair using components separation with or without biologic mesh: a cost-utility analysis. Chatterjee A; Krishnan NM; Rosen JM Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Apr; 74(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 24051454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing complications and cost-utilization in ventral hernia repair utilizing biologic mesh in a bridged underlay technique. Basta MN; Fischer JP; Kovach SJ Am J Surg; 2015 Apr; 209(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 25305799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of biologic mesh: where do we stand? Harris HW Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Oct; 93(5):1217-25. PubMed ID: 24035084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complex ventral hernia repair using components separation with or without biologic mesh: a cost-utility analysis: reply. Chatterjee A; Krishnan NM; Rosen JM Ann Plast Surg; 2014 May; 72(5):610-1. PubMed ID: 24732079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Complex ventral hernia repair using components separation with or without biologic mesh: a cost-utility analysis. Macarios D; Franz M; Dawidczyk AM Ann Plast Surg; 2014 May; 72(5):610. PubMed ID: 24691337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate/absorbable barrier composite mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Scott JR; Deeken CR; Martindale RG; Rosen MJ Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3691-701. PubMed ID: 27369286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair. Liang MK; Berger RL; Nguyen MT; Hicks SC; Li LT; Leong M Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Oct; 15(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 25215466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-Utility Analysis of Biologic and Biosynthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: When Are They Worth It? Schneeberger S; Phillips S; Huang LC; Pierce RA; Etemad SA; Poulose BK J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Jan; 228(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 30359837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Synthetic and Biologic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair Using Components Separation Technique. Sandvall BK; Suver DW; Said HK; Mathes DW; Neligan PC; Dellinger EP; Louie O Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76(6):674-9. PubMed ID: 25003419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]