BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28214565)

  • 1. Trends and outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade procedures: A comparative analysis using a United States National Database 2003-2013.
    Cheung JW; Ip JE; Markowitz SM; Liu CF; Thomas G; Feldman DN; Swaminathan RV; Lerman BB; Kim LK
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Jul; 14(7):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 28214565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of institutional procedural volume on inhospital outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation: US national database 2003-2011.
    Yeo I; Kim LK; Lerman BB; Cheung JW
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Dec; 14(12):1826-1832. PubMed ID: 28917564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Upgrade Versus De Novo Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Clinical Response and Long-Term Survival: Results from a Multicenter Study.
    Vamos M; Erath JW; Bari Z; Vagany D; Linzbach SP; Burmistrava T; Israel CW; Duray GZ; Hohnloser SH
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2017 Feb; 10(2):e004471. PubMed ID: 28202628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incidence, predictors, and procedural results of upgrade to resynchronization therapy: the RAFT upgrade substudy.
    Essebag V; Joza J; Birnie DH; Sapp JL; Sterns LD; Philippon F; Yee R; Crystal E; Kus T; Rinne C; Healey JS; Sami M; Thibault B; Exner DV; Coutu B; Simpson CS; Wulffhart Z; Yetisir E; Wells G; Tang AS
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 8(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 25417892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcomes after upgrading from pacemakers to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Leyva F; Zegard A; Patel K; Panting J; Marshall H; Qiu T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 Mar; 41(3):290-298. PubMed ID: 29369371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complications associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrades versus de novo implantations.
    Sidhu BS; Gould J; Sieniewicz BJ; Porter B; Rinaldi CA
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2018 Aug; 16(8):607-615. PubMed ID: 29985076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades.
    Bogale N; Witte K; Priori S; Cleland J; Auricchio A; Gadler F; Gitt A; Limbourg T; Linde C; Dickstein K;
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2011 Sep; 13(9):974-83. PubMed ID: 21771823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Analysis of Procedural Outcomes and Complications Between De Novo and Upgraded Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Nemer DM; Patel DR; Madden RA; Wilkoff BL; Rickard JW; Tarakji KG; Varma N; Hussein AA; Wazni OM; Kanj M; Baranowski B; Cantillon DJ
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Jan; 7(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 33478714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. De novo implantation vs. upgrade cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kosztin A; Vamos M; Aradi D; Schwertner WR; Kovacs A; Nagy KV; Zima E; Geller L; Duray GZ; Kutyifa V; Merkely B
    Heart Fail Rev; 2018 Jan; 23(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 29047028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of De Novo versus Upgrade Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Focused on the Upgrade for Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy.
    Gwag HB; Chun KJ; Hwang JK; Park KM; On YK; Kim JS; Park SJ
    Yonsei Med J; 2017 Jul; 58(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 28540981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency of in-hospital adverse outcomes and cost utilization associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator implantation in the United States.
    Patel N; Viles-Gonzalez J; Agnihotri K; Arora S; Patel NJ; Aneja E; Shah M; Badheka AO; Pothineni NV; Kancharla K; Mulpuru S; Noseworthy PA; Kusumoto F; Cha YM; Deshmukh AJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1425-1435. PubMed ID: 30016005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term survival following upgrade compared with de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation: a single-centre, high-volume experience.
    Schwertner WR; Behon A; Merkel ED; Tokodi M; Kovács A; Zima E; Osztheimer I; Molnár L; Király Á; Papp R; Gellér L; Kuthi L; Veres B; Kosztin A; Merkely B
    Europace; 2021 Aug; 23(8):1310-1318. PubMed ID: 34037220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: US Trends and Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes.
    Sridhar AR; Yarlagadda V; Parasa S; Reddy YM; Patel D; Lakkireddy D; Wilkoff BL; Dawn B
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 9(3):e003108. PubMed ID: 26921376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilization and in-hospital complications of cardiac resynchronization therapy: trends in the United States from 2003 to 2013.
    Hosseini SM; Moazzami K; Rozen G; Vaid J; Saleh A; Heist KE; Vangel M; Ruskin JN
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Jul; 38(27):2122-2128. PubMed ID: 28329322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term outcome after upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Trenson S; Voros G; Martens P; Ingelaere S; Betschart P; Voigt JU; Dupont M; Breitenstein A; Steffel J; Willems R; Ruschitzka F; Mullens W; Winnik S; Vandenberk B
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2024 Feb; 26(2):511-520. PubMed ID: 37905357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of
    Zandi Z; Eslami M; Kamali F; Teimouri-Jervekani Z; Taherpour M; Mollazadeh R; Haghjoo M; Fazelifar AF; Alizadeh A; Madadi S; Hosseini Selki Sar S; Emkanjoo Z
    Acta Cardiol; 2024 May; 79(3):338-343. PubMed ID: 38032242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes of upgrade to versus de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure patients with atrioventricular block.
    Kanai M; Yagishita D; Shoda M; Ejima K; Hagiwara N
    J Cardiol; 2022 Jan; 79(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 34426046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Upgrades from a previous device compared to de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy in the European Society of Cardiology CRT Survey II.
    Linde CM; Normand C; Bogale N; Auricchio A; Sterlinski M; Marinskis G; Sticherling C; Bulava A; Pérez ÓC; Maass AH; Witte KK; Rekvava R; Abdelali S; Dickstein K
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2018 Oct; 20(10):1457-1468. PubMed ID: 29806208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of
    Stassen J; Scherrenberg M; Dilling-Boer D; Vijgen J; Koopman P; Schurmans J; Herbots L; Verwerft J; Schroyens M; Timmermans P
    Acta Cardiol; 2021 Nov; 76(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 33432875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Upgrade and de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact of paced or intrinsic QRS morphology on outcomes and survival.
    Wokhlu A; Rea RF; Asirvatham SJ; Webster T; Brooke K; Hodge DO; Wiste HJ; Dong Y; Hayes DL; Cha YM
    Heart Rhythm; 2009 Oct; 6(10):1439-47. PubMed ID: 19717348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.