These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28214576)

  • 21. Sound-Making Actions Lead to Immediate Plastic Changes of Neuromagnetic Evoked Responses and Induced β-Band Oscillations during Perception.
    Ross B; Barat M; Fujioka T
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(24):5948-5959. PubMed ID: 28539421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Passive sound exposure induces rapid perceptual learning in musicians: event-related potential evidence.
    Seppänen M; Hämäläinen J; Pesonen AK; Tervaniemi M
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Oct; 94(2):341-53. PubMed ID: 23886959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tracing the emergence of categorical speech perception in the human auditory system.
    Bidelman GM; Moreno S; Alain C
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():201-12. PubMed ID: 23648960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of musicianship on the cortical mechanisms related to separating speech from background noise.
    Zendel BR; Tremblay CD; Belleville S; Peretz I
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):1044-59. PubMed ID: 25390195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Induced neural beta oscillations predict categorical speech perception abilities.
    Bidelman GM
    Brain Lang; 2015 Feb; 141():62-9. PubMed ID: 25540857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.
    Bidelman GM; Krishnan A
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1355():112-25. PubMed ID: 20691672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Musicians have fine-tuned neural distinction of speech syllables.
    Parbery-Clark A; Tierney A; Strait DL; Kraus N
    Neuroscience; 2012 Sep; 219():111-9. PubMed ID: 22634507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Musical training shapes neural responses to melodic and prosodic expectation.
    Zioga I; Di Bernardi Luft C; Bhattacharya J
    Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 1650():267-282. PubMed ID: 27622645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of Long-Term Musical Training on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Driscoll V; Mussoi B; Deshpande SB; Gfeller K; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):e74-e84. PubMed ID: 28225736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electrophysiological evidences demonstrating differences in brain functions between nonmusicians and musicians.
    Zhang L; Peng W; Chen J; Hu L
    Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():13796. PubMed ID: 26338509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neural correlates of perceptual grouping effects in the processing of sound omission by musicians and nonmusicians.
    Ono K; Altmann CF; Matsuhashi M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
    Hear Res; 2015 Jan; 319():25-31. PubMed ID: 25446245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The sound of music: differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm.
    Vuust P; Brattico E; Seppänen M; Näätänen R; Tervaniemi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1432-43. PubMed ID: 22414595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Data-driven machine learning models for decoding speech categorization from evoked brain responses.
    Mahmud MS; Yeasin M; Bidelman GM
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Mar; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33690177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Listening to the brainstem: musicianship enhances intelligibility of subcortical representations for speech.
    Weiss MW; Bidelman GM
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1687-91. PubMed ID: 25632143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pitch expertise is not created equal: Cross-domain effects of musicianship and tone language experience on neural and behavioural discrimination of speech and music.
    Hutka S; Bidelman GM; Moreno S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():52-63. PubMed ID: 25797590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Music and language expertise influence the categorization of speech and musical sounds: behavioral and electrophysiological measurements.
    Elmer S; Klein C; Kühnis J; Liem F; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2356-69. PubMed ID: 24702451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Event-related brain potentials to sound omissions differ in musicians and non-musicians.
    Rüsseler J; Altenmüller E; Nager W; Kohlmetz C; Münte TF
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Jul; 308(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11445279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electrical Brain Responses to an Auditory Illusion and the Impact of Musical Expertise.
    Ioannou CI; Pereda E; Lindsen JP; Bhattacharya J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129486. PubMed ID: 26065708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.