These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28214768)

  • 1. Selective attention meets spontaneous recognition memory: Evidence for effects at retrieval.
    Moen KC; Miller JK; Lloyd ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():181-189. PubMed ID: 28214768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.
    Weeks JC; Hasher L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 27900585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective attention affects implicit and explicit memory for familiar pictures at different delay conditions.
    Ballesteros S; Reales JM; García E; Carrasco M
    Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 17296015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related changes in neural oscillations supporting context memory retrieval.
    Strunk J; James T; Arndt J; Duarte A
    Cortex; 2017 Jun; 91():40-55. PubMed ID: 28237686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distractor devaluation in a flanker task: object-specific effects without distractor recognition memory.
    Martiny-Huenger T; Gollwitzer PM; Oettingen G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):613-25. PubMed ID: 24016067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The posterior parietal cortex in recognition memory: a neuropsychological study.
    Haramati S; Soroker N; Dudai Y; Levy DA
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1756-66. PubMed ID: 18178228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the thalamic nuclei in recognition memory accompanied by recall during encoding and retrieval: an fMRI study.
    Pergola G; Ranft A; Mathias K; Suchan B
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():195-208. PubMed ID: 23435209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced recognition of memorable pictures in ultra-fast RSVP.
    Broers N; Potter MC; Nieuwenstein MR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 28484948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of modality on memory for original and misleading information.
    Dijkstra K; Moerman EM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 22459559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering.
    Dudukovic NM; Dubrow S; Wagner AD
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):953-61. PubMed ID: 19744935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional limits in memory retrieval-revisited.
    Green C; Johnston JC; Ruthruff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1083-98. PubMed ID: 21517217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contextual consistency facilitates long-term memory of perceptual detail in barely seen images.
    Gronau N; Shachar M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1095-111. PubMed ID: 26010591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.
    Ciaramelli E; Grady CL; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1828-51. PubMed ID: 18471837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reinstatement of encoding context during recollection: behavioural and neuroimaging evidence of a double dissociation.
    Skinner EI; Manios M; Fugelsang J; Fernandes MA
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 May; 264():51-63. PubMed ID: 24495660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Source recognition by stimulus content in the MTL.
    Park H; Abellanoza C; Schaeffer J; Gandy K
    Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 1553():59-68. PubMed ID: 24486613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reactivation of context-specific brain regions during retrieval.
    Skinner EI; Grady CL; Fernandes MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):156-64. PubMed ID: 19733581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of divided attention during verbal learning in young adults following mild traumatic brain injury.
    Blanchet S; Paradis-Giroux AA; Pépin M; McKerral M
    Brain Inj; 2009 Feb; 23(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 19191090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing.
    Park H; Rugg MD
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 17652467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.