These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28215407)

  • 1. A Simplified Vocal Profile Analysis Protocol for the Assessment of Voice Quality and Speaker Similarity.
    San Segundo E; Mompean JA
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):644.e11-644.e27. PubMed ID: 28215407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Euclidean Distances as measures of speaker similarity including identical twin pairs: A forensic investigation using source and filter voice characteristics.
    San Segundo E; Tsanas A; Gómez-Vilda P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():25-38. PubMed ID: 27912151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
    Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Telephone Transmission on Voice Quality Perception.
    Passetti RR; Constantini AC
    J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):649-658. PubMed ID: 30146232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
    Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.
    Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Fernandes ACN; de Souza Medved DM; da Silva EM; Júnior FB
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):774.e1-774.e8. PubMed ID: 28318969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual Detection of Subtle Dysphonic Traits in Individuals with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using an Audience Response Systems Approach.
    Johansson K; Strömbergsson S; Robieux C; McAllister A
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):126.e7-126.e17. PubMed ID: 26850470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
    Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling listener perception of speaker similarity in dysarthria.
    Lansford KL; Berisha V; Utianski RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):EL209. PubMed ID: 27369174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Grade of Dysphonia and Correlation With Quality of Life Protocol.
    Spina AL; Crespo AN
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e21-243.e26. PubMed ID: 27658338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual Assessment of Tracheoesophageal Voice Quality With the SToPS: The Development of a Reliable and Valid Tool.
    Hurren A; Miller N; Carding P
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):465-472. PubMed ID: 30072205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality.
    Sofranko JL; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 24119637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for Voice Disorders in Older Adults (RAVI)-Part III: Cutoff Score and Clinical Consistency.
    Pernambuco L; Espelt A; Costa de Lima K
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):117.e17-117.e22. PubMed ID: 27085911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Computer-Based Tool for the Assessment of Voice Quality Through Visual Analogue Scales: VAS-Simplified Vocal Profile Analysis.
    San Segundo E; Skarnitzl R
    J Voice; 2021 May; 35(3):497.e9-497.e21. PubMed ID: 31727412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.