145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28216122)
1. Pitch ranking with different virtual channel configurations in electrical hearing.
Padilla M; Stupak N; Landsberger DM
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():54-62. PubMed ID: 28216122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
Mens LH; Berenstein CK
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation.
Srinivasan AG; Landsberger DM; Shannon RV
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 20850513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.
Nogueira W; Litvak LM; Landsberger DM; Büchner A
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():223-234. PubMed ID: 27939418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients.
Landsberger DM; Srinivasan AG
Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 19383534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
Luo X; Garrett C
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.
Wu CC; Luo X
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 17(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 26691160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users.
de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Biesheuvel JD; Snel-Bongers J; Böhringer S; Timp GRFM; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 31977727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of a pitch perception model to investigate the effect of stimulation field spread on the pitch ranking abilities of cochlear implant recipients.
Erfanian Saeedi N; Blamey PJ; Burkitt AN; Grayden DB
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():129-37. PubMed ID: 25193552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrically evoked compound action potential measures for virtual channels versus physical electrodes.
Hughes ML; Goulson AM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 21187752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of children using a unilateral cochlear implant, bimodal stimulation or bilateral hearing aids.
Looi V; Radford CJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 21300411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear Place of Stimulation Is One Determinant of Cochlear Implant Sound Quality.
Dorman MF; Cook Natale S; Baxter L; Zeitler DM; Carlson ML; Noble JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(5):264-269. PubMed ID: 31661682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Firszt JB; Koch DB; Downing M; Litvak L
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 17667771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The perception of complex pitch in cochlear implants: A comparison of monopolar and tripolar stimulation.
Fielden CA; Kluk K; Boyle PJ; McKay CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2524-36. PubMed ID: 26520335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
