302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28216329)
1. Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer: European Validation of the Current NCCN® Guideline.
Pompe RS; Karakiewicz PI; Tian Z; Mandel P; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Salomon G; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
J Urol; 2017 Aug; 198(2):354-361. PubMed ID: 28216329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.
Menon M; Dalela D; Jamil M; Diaz M; Tallman C; Abdollah F; Sood A; Lehtola L; Miller D; Jeong W
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 29225060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological, oncologic and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy following active surveillance.
Satkunasivam R; Kulkarni GS; Zlotta AR; Kalnin R; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner NE; Hamilton RJ; Jewett MA; Finelli A
J Urol; 2013 Jul; 190(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 23321581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Subclassification of Pathologically Organ Confined (pT2) Prostate Cancer Provide Prognostic Discrimination of Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy?
Nguyen DP; Vertosick EA; Sharma V; Corradi RB; Vilaseca A; Takeda T; Sjoberg DD; Benfante N; Fine SW; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Eastham JA; Karnes RJ; Touijer KA
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1502-1509. PubMed ID: 29307681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive factors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Murata Y; Tatsugami K; Yoshikawa M; Hamaguchi M; Yamada S; Hayakawa Y; Ueda K; Momosaki S; Sakamoto N
Int J Urol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):284-289. PubMed ID: 29315854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk Stratification of pN+ Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy from a Large Single Institutional Series with Long-Term Followup.
Moschini M; Sharma V; Zattoni F; Boorjian SA; Frank I; Gettman MT; Thompson RH; Tollefson MK; Kwon ED; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2016 Jun; 195(6):1773-8. PubMed ID: 26723866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Perioperative parameters and prognosis analysis of patients aged 80 years or older treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer].
Zhang F; Zhang SD; Xiao CL; Huang Y; Ma LL
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 50(5):822-827. PubMed ID: 30337742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk classification in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study in Chinese prostate cancer patients.
Xu H; Zhu Y; Dai B; Ye DW
Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(6):551-554. PubMed ID: 30027928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Factors for Biochemical Recurrence More than 10 Years after Radical Prostatectomy.
Liesenfeld L; Kron M; Gschwend JE; Herkommer K
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 27418452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Repeat Prostate Biopsies on Oncologic, Pathological and Perioperative Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy.
Rosenbaum CM; Mandel P; Tennstedt P; Boehm K; Chun FK; Graefen M; Heinzer H; Tilki D; Salomon G
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 27506693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of time from biopsy to surgery on complications, functional and oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy.
Westerman ME; Sharma V; Bailey GC; Boorjian SA; Frank I; Gettman MT; Thompson RH; Tollefson MK; Karnes RJ
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(3):468-477. PubMed ID: 30676305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
