314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28216504)
1. [Laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer without incision at abdomen versus traditional laparoscopic resection: A Meta-analysis].
Yang X; Su W; Deng Z; Wang Q; Xu X; Cao J
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Jan; 42(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 28216504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic review of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer.
Liu X; Li JB; Shi G; Guo R; Zhang R
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 16(1):220. PubMed ID: 30414613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer].
Tan SJ; Jiang Y; Xi QL; Meng QY; Zhuang QL; Han YS; Wu GH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 23(6):589-596. PubMed ID: 32521980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction.
Hisada M; Katsumata K; Ishizaki T; Enomoto M; Matsudo T; Kasuya K; Tsuchida A
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 20(44):16707-13. PubMed ID: 25469041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.
Ding Y; Li Z; Gao H; Cao Y; Jin W
J BUON; 2019; 24(5):1817-1823. PubMed ID: 31786842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched analysis of 214 cases.
Katsuno G; Fukunaga M; Nagakari K; Yoshikawa S; Azuma D; Kohama S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1317-25. PubMed ID: 26139507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of conventional laparoscopic and hand-assisted oncologic segmental colonic resection.
Ringley C; Lee YK; Iqbal A; Bocharev V; Sasson A; McBride CL; Thompson JS; Vitamvas ML; Oleynikov D
Surg Endosc; 2007 Dec; 21(12):2137-41. PubMed ID: 17522925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Natural orifice versus transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis.
Brincat SD; Lauri J; Cini C
BJS Open; 2022 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35640267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hoyuela C; Juvany M; Carvajal F
Am J Surg; 2017 Jul; 214(1):127-140. PubMed ID: 28343612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer].
Tao J; Wang X; Liu Z; Jiang Z; Guo C; Chen J; Wang Z; Liu Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 21(3):292-298. PubMed ID: 29577217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report.
Milsom JW; Böhm B; Hammerhofer KA; Fazio V; Steiger E; Elson P
J Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jul; 187(1):46-54; discussion 54-5. PubMed ID: 9660024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than a thousand procedures.
Maggiori L; Gaujoux S; Tribillon E; Bretagnol F; Panis Y
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):e643-54. PubMed ID: 22632808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Propensity score matching-based analysis of short-term outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for left colorectal cancer radical resection].
Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Qiu XF; Yan F; Yuan SS; Cai JC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 May; 96(20):1578-81. PubMed ID: 27266686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhang X; Wu Q; Hu T; Gu C; Bi L; Wang Z
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1251-1262. PubMed ID: 28813634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Security and Radical Assessment in Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study.
Yang SX; Sun ZQ; Zhou QB; Xu JZ; Chang Y; Xia KK; Wang GX; Li Z; Song JM; Zhang ZY; Yuan WT; Liu JB
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818794160. PubMed ID: 30198395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang Y; Liu R; Zhang Z; Xue Q; Yan J; Yu J; Liu H; Zhao L; Mou T; Deng H; Li G
Trials; 2015 Nov; 16():539. PubMed ID: 26620555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis.
Ma B; Huang XZ; Gao P; Zhao JH; Song YX; Sun JX; Chen XW; Wang ZN
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1479-88. PubMed ID: 26238472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Meta analysis of postoperative complications between laparoscopic resection and traditional open resection of mid-low rectal carcinoma].
Chen WX; Jiang WZ; Liu X; Chen ZF; Guan GX
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1174-9. PubMed ID: 24369400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of previous abdominal surgery on surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: subanalysis of a large multicenter study in Japan.
Yamamoto S; Hinoi T; Niitsu H; Okajima M; Ide Y; Murata K; Akamoto S; Kanazawa A; Nakanishi M; Naitoh T; Kanehira E; Shimamura T; Suzuka I; Fukunaga Y; Yamaguchi T; Watanabe M;
J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jun; 52(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 27650199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of previous abdominal surgery on outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Yamamoto M; Okuda J; Tanaka K; Kondo K; Asai K; Kayano H; Masubuchi S; Uchiyama K
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Mar; 56(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 23392148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
