These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28217047)

  • 1. Tissue type determination by impedance measurement: A bipolar and monopolar comparison.
    Sharp J; Bouazza-Marouf K; Noronha D; Gaur A
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28217047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lock-in Amplifier-Based Impedance Detection of Tissue Type Using a Monopolar Injection Needle.
    Kim J; Abbasi MA; Kim T; Park KD; Cho S
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 31652819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Needle-based ablation of renal parenchyma using microwave, cryoablation, impedance- and temperature-based monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency, and liquid and gel chemoablation: laboratory studies and review of the literature.
    Rehman J; Landman J; Lee D; Venkatesh R; Bostwick DG; Sundaram C; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2004 Feb; 18(1):83-104. PubMed ID: 15006061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ex vivo experiment of saline-enhanced hepatic bipolar radiofrequency ablation with a perfused needle electrode: comparison with conventional monopolar and simultaneous monopolar modes.
    Lee JM; Kim SH; Han JK; Sohn KL; Choi BI
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2005; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 15789259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative experimental study of the in-vitro efficiency of hypertonic saline-enhanced hepatic bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency ablation.
    Lee JM; Han JK; Kim SH; Sohn KL; Lee KH; Ah SK; Choi BI
    Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 14530645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of renal ablation with monopolar radiofrequency and hypertonic-saline-augmented bipolar radiofrequency: in vitro and in vivo experimental studies.
    Lee JM; Han JK; Choi SH; Kim SH; Lee JY; Shin KS; Han CJ; Choi BI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):897-905. PubMed ID: 15728615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interaction between electrosurgical generators, endoscopic electrodes, and tissue.
    Tucker RD; Sievert CE; Kramolowsky EV; Vennes JA; Silvis SE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1992; 38(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 1568605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiofrequency energy-induced heating of bovine capsular tissue: Temperature changes produced by bipolar versus monopolar electrodes.
    Shellock FG
    Arthroscopy; 2001 Feb; 17(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 11172240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-Time Impedance Detection of Intra-Articular Space in a Porcine Model Using a Monopolar Injection Needle.
    Abbasi MA; Kim H; Chinnadayyala SR; Park KD; Cho S
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(16):. PubMed ID: 32824575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bipolar versus monopolar sphincterotomy: a prospective trial.
    Siegel JH; Veerappan A; Tucker R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1994 Oct; 89(10):1827-30. PubMed ID: 7942676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of the prostate: first ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation.
    Wendt-Nordahl G; Häcker A; Fastenmeier K; Knoll T; Reich O; Alken P; Michel MS
    J Endourol; 2005 Dec; 19(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 16359216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of urologic application of bipolar versus monopolar five French electrosurgical probes.
    Tucker RD; Kramolowsky EV; Bedell E; Platz CE
    J Urol; 1989 Mar; 141(3):662-5. PubMed ID: 2918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recording characteristics of electrical impedance-electromyography needle electrodes.
    Kwon H; Di Cristina JF; Rutkove SB; Sanchez B
    Physiol Meas; 2018 May; 39(5):055005. PubMed ID: 29616985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of internally water-perfused and cryogenically cooled monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency applicators in ex vivo liver samples.
    Rempp H; Mezger D; Voigtlaender M; Scharpf M; Hoffmann R; Pereira PL; Enderle MD; Claussen CD; Clasen S
    Acad Radiol; 2014 May; 21(5):661-6. PubMed ID: 24703480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radio frequency ablation in the rabbit lung using wet electrodes: comparison of monopolar and dual bipolar electrode mode.
    Jin GY; Park SH; Han YM; Chung GH; Kwak HS; Jeon Sb; Lee YC
    Korean J Radiol; 2006; 7(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 16799270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impedance of a spherical monopolar electrode.
    Ragheb T; Riegle S; Geddes LA; Amin V
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(6):617-27. PubMed ID: 1449230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hepatic bipolar radio-frequency ablation between separated multiprong electrodes.
    Haemmerich D; Staelin ST; Tungjitkusolmun S; Lee FT; Mahvi DM; Webster JG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct; 48(10):1145-52. PubMed ID: 11585038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation: is the shape of the coagulation volume different in comparison to monopolar RF-ablation using variable active tip lengths?
    Bruners P; Lipka J; Günther RW; Schmitz-Rode T; Mahnken AH
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 18855208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver in patients with chronic liver disease: comparison of monopolar and bipolar diffusion gradients for image quality and lesion detection.
    Lewis S; Kamath A; Chatterji M; Patel A; Shyknevsky I; Dyvorne HA; Kuehn B; Taouli B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25539238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.