These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28217275)

  • 21. Exploring the clinical approach to the bimodal fitting of hearing aids and cochlear implants: results of an international survey.
    Scherf FW; Arnold LP;
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Nov; 134(11):1151-7. PubMed ID: 25315914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benefits of upgrading to the Nucleus
    Todorov MJ; Galvin KL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jul; 19(4):210-215. PubMed ID: 29566583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) with the Naída CI Q90 sound processor in experienced cochlear implant users.
    Battmer RD; Scholz S; Geissler G; Ernst A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):331-340. PubMed ID: 31464168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor.
    Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recognition of Speech from the Television with Use of a Wireless Technology Designed for Cochlear Implants.
    Duke MM; Wolfe J; Schafer E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May; 27(5):388-394. PubMed ID: 27179258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC; Heldner B; Mülder H; Ward E; Vincent B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):409-21. PubMed ID: 19928395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Controlled comparative clinical trial of hearing benefit outcomes for users of the Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Warren CD; Nel E; Boyd PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):116-126. PubMed ID: 30714500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Benefits of the HiRes 120 coding strategy combined with the Harmony processor in an adult European multicentre study.
    Büchner A; Lenarz T; Boermans PP; Frijns JH; Mancini P; Filipo R; Fielden C; Cooper H; Eklöf M; Freijd A; Lombaard S; Meerton L; Pickerill M; Vanat Z; Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Kienast B; Boyle P; Arnold L; Meyer B; Sterkers O; Müller-Deile J; Ambrosch P; Helbig S; Frachet B; Gallego S; Truy E; Jeffs E; Morant A; Marco J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 132(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 22074015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Self-Adjustment of Upper Electrical Stimulation Levels in CI Programming and the Effect on Auditory Functioning.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Metselaar RM; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e232-e240. PubMed ID: 28125445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Converted and upgraded maps programmed in the newer speech processor for the first generation of multichannel cochlear implant.
    Magalhães AT; Goffi-Gomez MV; Hoshino AC; Tsuji RK; Bento RF; Brito R
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1193-200. PubMed ID: 23921918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects.
    Kludt E; D'hondt C; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jun; 38(5):655-661. PubMed ID: 28406848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients.
    Cray JW; Allen RL; Stuart A; Hudson S; Layman E; Givens GD
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 13(2):200-12. PubMed ID: 15903146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term subjective benefit with a bone conduction implant sound processor in 44 patients with single-sided deafness.
    Desmet J; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jul; 35(6):1017-25. PubMed ID: 24751733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
    Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
    Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A proposed electroacoustic test protocol for personal FM receivers coupled to cochlear implant sound processors.
    Schafer EC; Musgrave E; Momin S; Sandrock C; Romine D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):941-54. PubMed ID: 24384080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors.
    Dazert S; Thomas JP; Büchner A; Müller J; Hempel JM; Löwenheim H; Mlynski R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 274(3):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 27909888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.