126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28218890)
1. Peer review in Clinical Pharmacology using the 8-D Assessment.
Woodcock BG
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Mar; 55(3):201-200. PubMed ID: 28218890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 10-D assessment and evidence-based medicine tool for authors and peer reviewers in clinical pharmacology
.
Woodcock BG; Harder S
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Aug; 55(8):639-642. PubMed ID: 28671061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fast and Furious (?).
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Mar; 66(2):125. PubMed ID: 29510434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Five Modes of Sudden Death.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):277. PubMed ID: 29860717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Standards in the face of uncertainty--peer review is flawed and under-researched, but the best we have.
Mertens S; Baethge C
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Dec; 109(51-52):900-2. PubMed ID: 23372614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of peer reviewed clinical medicine journals.
Eldredge J
Med Ref Serv Q; 1999; 18(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 10557841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis.
Hays M; Andrews M; Wilson R; Callender D; O'Malley PG; Douglas K
BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011082. PubMed ID: 27470506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals.
Khan MS; Shaikh A; Ochani RK; Akhtar T; Fatima K; Khan SU; Mookadam F; Murad MH; Figueredo VM; Doukky R; Krasuski RA
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 May; 12(5):e005260. PubMed ID: 31030545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal.
Smolčić VŠ; Simundić AM
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 25351350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.
Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS
Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.
Lovejoy TI; Revenson TA; France CR
Ann Behav Med; 2011 Aug; 42(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21505912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer Review in Transplantation.
Hutchinson JA
Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Acceptance and rejection of manuscripts for publication in the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.
DiPiro JT
Am J Pharm Educ; 2013 May; 77(4):66. PubMed ID: 23716734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
Greaves M
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. So, You Want to Improve Your Plastic Surgery Papers? Introducing PRS' Friendly EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines.
Rohrich RJ; Weinstein A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jul; 136(1):205-208. PubMed ID: 25829154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
