These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28218890)

  • 21. What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing?
    Parkinson L; Sims J
    Australas J Ageing; 2017 Jun; 36(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 28635096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adherence to guidelines for improved quality of data reporting: where are we today?
    Elia N; Tramèr MR
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):478-80. PubMed ID: 21659804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scientific writing: the process and the pitfalls.
    Byard RW
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):285-6. PubMed ID: 23832426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
    Newton DP
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors' Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review.
    Meyer HS; Durning SJ; Sklar DP; Maggio LA
    Acad Med; 2018 Mar; 93(3):464-470. PubMed ID: 28767495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are highly ranked dental journals at risk of editorial bias? An examination of information on the reporting of peer-review practices.
    Faggion CM
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(7):459-470. PubMed ID: 35016571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Editorial Evaluation and Peer Review During a Pandemic: How Journals Maintain Standards.
    Bauchner H; Fontanarosa PB; Golub RM
    JAMA; 2020 Aug; 324(5):453-454. PubMed ID: 32589195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 'How to count sperm properly': checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis.
    Björndahl L; Barratt CL; Mortimer D; Jouannet P
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 26682580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
    Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
    BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?
    Blanco D; Biggane AM; Cobo E;
    Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 29378640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A thank you note from the editor-in-chief.
    Farrell GC
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jan; 27(1):10. PubMed ID: 22188026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
    Elmore SA
    Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.
    Lusher AD
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2015 Sep; 115(9):566-9. PubMed ID: 26322935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transparent reporting of trials is essential.
    Altman DG
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1231-5. PubMed ID: 23912401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The publication of ethically uncertain research: attitudes and practices of journal editors.
    Angelski C; Fernandez CV; Weijer C; Gao J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2012 Apr; 13():4. PubMed ID: 22494972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A review of peer review by peers.
    Heinemann MK
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Dec; 61(8):649-50. PubMed ID: 24323666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
    Bugiardini R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Independence Day.
    Heinemann MK
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(2):73. PubMed ID: 28282657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.