169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28219264)
1. We are not Gametes: Distinguishing between Abortion and Contraception.
Saad T
New Bioeth; 2016 Nov; 22(3):202-211. PubMed ID: 28219264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.
Wrigley A
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e15-8. PubMed ID: 23637455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
Giubilini A; Minerva F
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 22361296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's 'Future-Like-Ours' Argument.
Reitan E
Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 26424415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potentiality and human embryos.
Lizza JP
Bioethics; 2007 Sep; 21(7):379-85. PubMed ID: 17845464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emergency Contraceptives and the Beginning of Human Animals.
Paez E
Bioethics; 2016 Jul; 30(6):433-9. PubMed ID: 26764238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsibility Arguments in Defence of Abortion: When One is Morally Responsible for the Creation of a Fetus.
Kirschenheiter T
New Bioeth; 2023 Dec; 29(4):340-351. PubMed ID: 37768733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Birth, meaningful viability and abortion.
Jensen D
J Med Ethics; 2015 Jun; 41(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 25012846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'.
Rini RA
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 23637452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal tissue transplantation: can it be morally insulated from abortion?
Strong C
J Med Ethics; 1991 Jun; 17(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1870085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.
Beard M; Lynch S
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e1-4. PubMed ID: 23637453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. After-birth abortion: the intuition argument.
Lederman Z
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e5. PubMed ID: 23637457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The moral status of a human fetus: a response to Lee.
Griffith S
Christ Bioeth; 2004; 10(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15675036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion, infanticide and moral context.
Porter L
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):350-2. PubMed ID: 23637451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Viable Violinist.
Hawking M
Bioethics; 2016 Jun; 30(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 26423668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle.
Rocchi B
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 23637458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IVF technology and the argument from potential.
Singer P; Dawson K
Philos Public Aff; 1988; 17(2):87-104. PubMed ID: 11659114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Killing fetuses and killing newborns.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e19-20. PubMed ID: 23637456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stumbling on status: abortion, stem cells, and faulty reasoning.
Lebacqz K
Theor Med Bioeth; 2012 Feb; 33(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22209889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a Copernican revolution in our thinking about life's beginning and life's end.
Green RM
Soundings; 1983; 66(2):152-73. PubMed ID: 10264110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
