These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28219305)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yin Wei CC; Haw SS; Bashir ES; Beng SL; Shanmugam R; Keong KM
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017 Jan; 25(1):2309499017690656. PubMed ID: 28219305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
    Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support.
    Perez-Orribo L; Kalb S; Reyes PM; Chang SW; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 23104197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
    Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
    Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
    Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel pedicle screw and plate system provides superior stability in unilateral fixation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Li J; Xiao H; Zhu Q; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H; Huang Z; Shang J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123134. PubMed ID: 25807513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and axial interbody threaded rod on range of motion and S1 screw loading in a destabilized L5-S1 spondylolisthesis model.
    Fleischer GD; Hart D; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Avidano EE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):E82-8. PubMed ID: 24150429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
    Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Iliac screws may not be necessary in long-segment constructs with L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: cadaveric study of stability and instrumentation strain.
    Hlubek RJ; Godzik J; Newcomb AGUS; Lehrman JN; de Andrada B; Bohl MA; Farber SH; Kelly BP; Turner JD
    Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):942-950. PubMed ID: 30419290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Li J; Shang J; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144637. PubMed ID: 26649749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.
    Cannestra AF; Peterson MD; Parker SR; Roush TF; Bundy JV; Turner AW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S44-9. PubMed ID: 26825792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of different surgical procedures in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in vitro.
    Cao Y; Liu F; Wan S; Liang Y; Jiang C; Feng Z; Jiang X; Chen Z
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Nov; 49():91-95. PubMed ID: 28898815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study.
    Keiler A; Schmoelz W; Erhart S; Gnanalingham K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 24875958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Biomechanical evaluation of asymmetrical posterior internal fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with transfacetopedicular screws].
    Ao J; Jin AM; Zhao WD; Zhang H; Min SX; Yu B; Chen WY
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 May; 29(5):959-61, 965. PubMed ID: 19460720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation.
    Deguchi M; Cheng BC; Sato K; Matsuyama Y; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. PubMed ID: 9654619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.