180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28219323)
1. A preliminary assessment of the LMA protector™ in non-paralysed patients.
Sng BL; Ithnin FB; Mathur D; Lew E; Han NR; Sia AT
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):26. PubMed ID: 28219323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical performance of the LMA Protector™ airway in moderately obese patients.
Shariffuddin II; Chaw SH; Ng LW; Lim CH; Zainal Abidin MF; Wan Zakaria WA; Teoh WH
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):184. PubMed ID: 32736516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Chang JE; Kim H; Lee JM; Min SW; Won D; Jun K; Hwang JY
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31272379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LMA® protector™ in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries: a multicenter prospective observational study.
Liu Y; Song Y; Wang M; Yang M; Shen H; Wang Z; Chen L; Yang J; Gong S; Yu Y; Shi Z; Zhang W; Zou X; Sun X; Wang Y; Fu Q; Cao J; Mi W
BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):318. PubMed ID: 34930137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Bruppacher HR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Mar; 63(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 30229857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: A randomised controlled trial.
L'Hermite J; Dubout E; Bouvet S; Bracoud LH; Cuvillon P; Coussaye JE; Ripart J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Jul; 34(7):417-424. PubMed ID: 27755181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients.
Chan WK; Liu CY
Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23176. PubMed ID: 35308185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomised comparison of the Portex Softseal laryngeal mask airway with the LMA-Unique during anaesthesia.
Cook TM; Trümpelmann P; Beringer R; Stedeford J
Anaesthesia; 2005 Dec; 60(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 16288620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
Liew GH; Yu ED; Shah SS; Kothandan H
Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures.
Francksen H; Bein B; Cavus E; Renner J; Scholz J; Steinfath M; Tonner PH; Doerges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 16895620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients.
Cook TM; Gatward JJ; Handel J; Hardy R; Thompson C; Srivastava R; Clarke PA
Anaesthesia; 2009 May; 64(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 19413827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-pressurized air-Q
Ha SH; Kim MS; Suh J; Lee JS
Can J Anaesth; 2018 May; 65(5):543-550. PubMed ID: 29524199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
van Zundert AAJ; Wyssusek KH; Pelecanos A; Roets M; Kumar CM
J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients.
Francksen H; Renner J; Hanss R; Scholz J; Doerges V; Bein B
Anaesthesia; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1118-24. PubMed ID: 19735404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients.
Atef HM; Helmy AM; El-Taher EM; Henidak AM
Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 21(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 23327031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between LMA-Classic and AMBU AuraOnce laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective general anaesthesia with positive pressure ventilation.
Suzanna AB; Liu CY; Rozaidi SW; Ooi JS
Med J Malaysia; 2011 Oct; 66(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 22299547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. LMA Protector™ Airway: first experience with a new second generation laryngeal mask.
Eckardt F; Engel J; Mann ST; Müller M; Zajonz T; Koerner CM; Sander M; Mann V
Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Jan; 85(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 30207132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
