These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28219478)

  • 1. Assessment of the multi-criteria evaluation system of the Welfare Quality® protocol for growing pigs.
    Czycholl I; Kniese C; Schrader L; Krieter J
    Animal; 2017 Sep; 11(9):1573-1580. PubMed ID: 28219478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a multi-criteria evaluation model for animal welfare.
    Martín P; Czycholl I; Buxadé C; Krieter J
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):650-660. PubMed ID: 27573713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a multi-criteria evaluation system to assess growing pig welfare.
    Martín P; Traulsen I; Buxadé C; Krieter J
    Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):466-477. PubMed ID: 27431514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest reliability of the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for pigs applied to sows and piglets. Part 2. Assessment of the principles good feeding, good housing, and good health1.
    Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1143-1157. PubMed ID: 30668710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On-farm animal welfare assessment in beef bulls: consistency over time of single measures and aggregated Welfare Quality(®) scores.
    Kirchner MK; Schulze Westerath H; Knierim U; Tessitore E; Cozzi G; Winckler C
    Animal; 2014 Mar; 8(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 24330803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short communication: Evaluation of the sample size of individual indicators in gestating sows concerning the Welfare Quality® protocol applied to sows and piglets.
    Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I
    Animal; 2020 Jun; 14(6):1278-1282. PubMed ID: 31937377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of the qualitative behavior assessment as included in the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for growing pigs.
    Czycholl I; Beilage EG; Henning C; Krieter J
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3445-3454. PubMed ID: 28805930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can the monitoring of animal welfare parameters predict pork meat quality variation through the supply chain (from farm to slaughter)?
    Rocha LM; Velarde A; Dalmau A; Saucier L; Faucitano L
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jan; 94(1):359-76. PubMed ID: 26812341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of animal welfare indicators for the on-farm self-assessment of fattening pigs.
    Pfeifer M; Eggemann L; Kransmann J; Schmitt AO; Hessel EF
    Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1712-1720. PubMed ID: 30630538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does group size have an impact on welfare indicators in fattening pigs?
    Meyer-Hamme SE; Lambertz C; Gauly M
    Animal; 2016 Jan; 10(1):142-9. PubMed ID: 26304017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Navigating the iceberg: reducing the number of parameters within the Welfare Quality(®) assessment protocol for dairy cows.
    Heath CA; Browne WJ; Mullan S; Main DC
    Animal; 2014 Dec; 8(12):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25159607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ANIMAL BEHAVIOR AND WELL-BEING SYMPOSIUM: The Common Swine Industry Audit: Future steps to assure positive on-farm animal welfare utilizing validated, repeatable and feasible animal-based measures.
    Pairis-Garcia M; Moeller SJ
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Mar; 95(3):1372-1381. PubMed ID: 28380534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs.
    van Staaveren N; Doyle B; Manzanilla EG; Calderón Díaz JA; Hanlon A; Boyle LA
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1528-1536. PubMed ID: 28464078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs.
    Baxter EM; Lawrence AB; Edwards SA
    Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):96-117. PubMed ID: 22436159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the Welfare Quality® assessment system on European beef bull farms.
    Kirchner MK; Schulze Westerath H; Knierim U; Tessitore E; Cozzi G; Pfeiffer C; Winckler C
    Animal; 2014 May; 8(5):827-35. PubMed ID: 24739354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing.
    Temple D; Courboulay V; Manteca X; Velarde A; Dalmau A
    Animal; 2012 Apr; 6(4):656-67. PubMed ID: 22436283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring welfare in rearing piglets: test-retest reliability of selected animal-based indicators.
    Witt J; Krieter J; Wilder T; Czycholl I
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37209717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats.
    Battini M; Vieira A; Barbieri S; Ajuda I; Stilwell G; Mattiello S
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Nov; 97(11):6625-48. PubMed ID: 25242423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of welfare of Brazilian and Belgian broiler flocks using the Welfare Quality protocol.
    Tuyttens FA; Federici JF; Vanderhasselt RF; Goethals K; Duchateau L; Sans EC; Molento CF
    Poult Sci; 2015 Aug; 94(8):1758-66. PubMed ID: 26049803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health scores for farmed animals: Screening pig health with register data from public and private databases.
    Nienhaus F; Meemken D; Schoneberg C; Hartmann M; Kornhoff T; May T; Heß S; Kreienbrock L; Wendt A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228497. PubMed ID: 32017788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.