These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28219478)

  • 21. Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare.
    de Jong IC; Hindle VA; Butterworth A; Engel B; Ferrari P; Gunnink H; Perez Moya T; Tuyttens FA; van Reenen CG
    Animal; 2016 Jan; 10(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 26306882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Animal welfare assessment at slaughter in Europe: moving from inputs to outputs.
    Velarde A; Dalmau A
    Meat Sci; 2012 Nov; 92(3):244-51. PubMed ID: 22551869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of pig welfare assessment protocol integrating animal-, environment-, and management-based measures.
    Renggaman A; Choi HL; Sudiarto SIa; Alasaarela L; Nam OS
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2015; 57():1. PubMed ID: 26290721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of Fear Assessment in Growing Pigs Exposed to a Novel Object Test in Commercial Conditions.
    Dalmau A; Mainau E; Velarde A
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2017; 20(3):280-288. PubMed ID: 28409651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Review: Space allowance for growing pigs: animal welfare, performance and on-farm practicality.
    Chidgey KL
    Animal; 2024 Jun; 18 Suppl 1():100890. PubMed ID: 37451903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correlation of animal-based parameters with environment-based parameters in an on-farm welfare assessment of growing pigs.
    Kang HJ; Bae S; Lee H
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2022 May; 64(3):539-563. PubMed ID: 35709106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feasibility and reliability of a German guideline for farm's self-monitoring in sows and piglets.
    Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Oct; 98(10):. PubMed ID: 32926161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The "Real Welfare" scheme: Identification of risk and protective factors for welfare outcomes in commercial pig farms in the UK.
    Pandolfi F; Kyriazakis I; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Edwards SA
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():34-43. PubMed ID: 28992926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a simplified Herd Health and Welfare Index for benchmarking in pig herds.
    Wadepohl K; Blaha T; Meemken D
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 2020 Jun; 48(3):156-164. PubMed ID: 32557513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Questionnaire assessment of the welfare of pigs.
    Horváth G; Visnyei L
    Acta Vet Hung; 2001; 49(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11402682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Applying ethological and health indicators to practical animal welfare assessment.
    Wemelsfelder F; Mullan S
    Rev Sci Tech; 2014 Apr; 33(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 25000783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consistency over time of animal-based welfare indicators as a further step for developing a welfare assessment monitoring scheme: The case of the Animal Welfare Indicators protocol for dairy goats.
    Can E; Vieira A; Battini M; Mattiello S; Stilwell G
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9194-9204. PubMed ID: 28865860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: model structure and weighting procedure.
    Bracke MB; Spruijt BM; Metz JH; Schouten WG
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jul; 80(7):1819-34. PubMed ID: 12162649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Physiological and nonphysiological indicators of body condition score in weaner pigs.
    Doyle RE; Groat J; Wynn PC; Holyoake PK
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1887-95. PubMed ID: 26020211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Toward a better understanding of pig behavior and pig welfare.
    Kittawornrat A; Zimmerman JJ
    Anim Health Res Rev; 2011 Jun; 12(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21092389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pre-slaughter cattle welfare indicators for use in commercial abattoirs with voluntary monitoring systems: A systematic review.
    Losada-Espinosa N; Villarroel M; María GA; Miranda-de la Lama GC
    Meat Sci; 2018 Apr; 138():34-48. PubMed ID: 29291504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter-observer reliability of animal-based welfare indicators included in the Animal Welfare Indicators welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats.
    Vieira A; Battini M; Can E; Mattiello S; Stilwell G
    Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1942-1949. PubMed ID: 29306346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Animal welfare law requirements for calf, swine and laying hen husbandry--experiences from Thüringen].
    Paar G; Weinlich P
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1994 Mar; 101(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8205953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reconciling productivity and welfare in intensive pig husbandry: a challenge for the year 2000.
    Robert S; Martineau GP
    Rev Sci Tech; 1994 Mar; 13(1):99-117. PubMed ID: 8173105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pig welfare assessment: development of a protocol and its use by veterinary undergraduates.
    Wright AJ; Powney SL; Nevel A; Wathes CM
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 19435990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.