These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28220091)

  • 1. Effort in Multitasking: Local and Global Assessment of Effort.
    Kiesel A; Dignath D
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():111. PubMed ID: 28220091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance.
    Reissland J; Manzey D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():27-40. PubMed ID: 27155317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching.
    Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Schmidt-Ott M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 28871331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual preferences for task coordination strategies in multitasking: exploring the link between preferred modes of processing and strategies of response organization.
    Brüning J; Reissland J; Manzey D
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):577-591. PubMed ID: 32006093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual Strategies of Response Organization in Multitasking Are Stable Even at Risk of High Between-Task Interference.
    Reinert R; Brüning J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():860219. PubMed ID: 35465496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The temporal dynamics of task processing and choice in a novel multitasking paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Heins S; Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jul; 88(5):1737-1757. PubMed ID: 38733537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing cognitive and environmental constraints when deciding to switch tasks: Exploring self-reported task-selection strategies in self-organised multitasking.
    Mittelstädt V; Schaffernak I; Miller J; Kiesel A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Apr; 74(4):598-609. PubMed ID: 33084523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flexibility of individual multitasking strategies in task-switching with preview: are preferences for serial versus overlapping task processing dependent on between-task conflict?
    Brüning J; Manzey D
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 28983726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of free-order and sequential-order instructions on task-order regulation in dual tasks.
    Kübler S; Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 28856434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Kiesel A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):699-715. PubMed ID: 29524178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linking task selection to task performance: Internal and predictable external processing constraints jointly influence voluntary task switching behavior.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1529-1548. PubMed ID: 31436454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1366. PubMed ID: 26441742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of reducing the number of candidate tasks in voluntary task switching.
    Kleinsorge T; Scheil J
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1555. PubMed ID: 25610421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. You can't always get what you want: the influence of unexpected task constraint on voluntary task switching.
    Weaver SM; Foxe JJ; Shpaner M; Wylie GR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2247-59. PubMed ID: 24916773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scaling of the Parameters for Cost Balancing in Self-Organized Task Switching.
    Monno I; Spitzer M; Miller J; Dignath D; Kiesel A
    J Cogn; 2021 Jan; 4(1):8. PubMed ID: 33554029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related differences in BOLD modulation to cognitive control costs in a multitasking paradigm: Global switch, local switch, and compatibility-switch costs.
    Nashiro K; Qin S; O'Connell MA; Basak C
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():146-161. PubMed ID: 29414492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multitasking strategies make the difference: Separating processing-code resources boosts multitasking efficiency when individuals prefer to interleave tasks in free concurrent dual tasking.
    Brüning J; Mückstein M; Manzey D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 33090838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching?
    Schuch S; Sommer A; Lukas S
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 29147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.