These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28220273)

  • 21. Comparison between non-invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve to assess the functional significance of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity.
    Meimoun P; Sayah S; Luycx-Bore A; Boulanger J; Elmkies F; Benali T; Zemir H; Doutrelan L; Clerc J
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Apr; 24(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 21353763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity.
    van de Hoef TP; van Lavieren MA; Damman P; Delewi R; Piek MA; Chamuleau SA; Voskuil M; Henriques JP; Koch KT; de Winter RJ; Spaan JA; Siebes M; Tijssen JG; Meuwissen M; Piek JJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jun; 7(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 24782198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel On-site Virtual Fractional Flow Reserve Parallel Computing System.
    Park HB; Jang Y; Arsanjani R; Nguyen MT; Lee SE; Jeon B; Jung S; Hong Y; Ha S; Kim S; Lee SW; Chang HJ
    Yonsei Med J; 2020 Feb; 61(2):137-144. PubMed ID: 31997622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patient-specific 3D hemodynamics modelling of left coronary artery under hyperemic conditions.
    Kamangar S; Badruddin IA; Govindaraju K; Nik-Ghazali N; Badarudin A; Viswanathan GN; Ahmed NJS; Khan TMY
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Aug; 55(8):1451-1461. PubMed ID: 28004229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of Varying Hemodynamic and Vascular Conditions on Fractional Flow Reserve: An In Vitro Study.
    Kolli KK; Min JK; Ha S; Soohoo H; Xiong G
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Jun; 5(7):. PubMed ID: 27364988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of hemodynamic parameters in patient-based coronary artery models with serial stenoses: normal and hypertension cases.
    Hoque KE; Ferdows M; Sawall S; Tzirtzilakis EE
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jul; 23(9):467-475. PubMed ID: 32159397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Coronary fractional flow reserve measurements of a stenosed side branch: a computational study investigating the influence of the bifurcation angle.
    Chiastra C; Iannaccone F; Grundeken MJ; Gijsen FJ; Segers P; De Beule M; Serruys PW; Wykrzykowska JJ; van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Aug; 15(1):91. PubMed ID: 27495804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: Methodology and evaluation of a point of care algorithm.
    Coenen A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono A; Dedic A; Chelu RG; Dijkshoorn ML; van Geuns RJ; Schoebinger M; Itu L; Sharma P; Nieman K
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 26747231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Flow restoration post revascularization predicted by stenosis indexes: sensitivity to hemodynamic variability.
    Algranati D; Kassab GS; Lanir Y
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2013 Jul; 305(2):H145-54. PubMed ID: 23645461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
    Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of myocardial perfusion parameters in an ex-vivo porcine heart model using third generation dual-source CT.
    Pelgrim GJ; Duguay TM; Stijnen JM; Varga-Szemes A; Van Tuijl S; Schoepf UJ; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 28202246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advances in three-dimensional coronary imaging and computational fluid dynamics: is virtual fractional flow reserve more than just a pretty picture?
    Poon EK; Hayat U; Thondapu V; Ooi AS; Ul Haq MA; Moore S; Foin N; Tu S; Chin C; Monty JP; Marusic I; Barlis P
    Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26 Suppl 1():e43-54. PubMed ID: 26247271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between central and peripheral venous adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve measurement.
    Seo MK; Koo BK; Kim JH; Shin DH; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 5(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 22647519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study.
    Gaur S; Achenbach S; Leipsic J; Mauri L; Bezerra HG; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(5):279-88. PubMed ID: 24268114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications of Coronary Flow Capacity: A Comprehensive Cross-Modality Physiological Concept in Ischemic Heart Disease.
    van de Hoef TP; Echavarría-Pinto M; van Lavieren MA; Meuwissen M; Serruys PW; Tijssen JG; Pocock SJ; Escaned J; Piek JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1670-80. PubMed ID: 26585617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of model order reduction on the computed fractional flow reserve using parameterized coronary geometries.
    Gashi K; Bosboom EMH; van de Vosse FN
    J Biomech; 2019 Jan; 82():313-323. PubMed ID: 30471791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Invasive coronary physiology for assessing intermediate lesions.
    Fearon WF
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):e001942. PubMed ID: 25657316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of side branch stenosis on fractional flow reserve assessment of the main branch in a swine model.
    Oh JH; Song S; Kim C; Kim J; Sup Park J; Won Lee H; Hyun Choi J; Cheol Lee H; Soo Cha K; Jong Hong T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):219-225. PubMed ID: 27535003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Practical tips and tricks for the measurement of fractional flow reserve.
    Sharif F; Trana C; Muller O; De Bruyne B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Dec; 76(7):978-85. PubMed ID: 20506385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio to Assess Coronary Stenosis Relevance: Results of ADVISE II International, Multicenter Study (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation II).
    Escaned J; Echavarría-Pinto M; Garcia-Garcia HM; van de Hoef TP; de Vries T; Kaul P; Raveendran G; Altman JD; Kurz HI; Brechtken J; Tulli M; Von Birgelen C; Schneider JE; Khashaba AA; Jeremias A; Baucum J; Moreno R; Meuwissen M; Mishkel G; van Geuns RJ; Levite H; Lopez-Palop R; Mayhew M; Serruys PW; Samady H; Piek JJ; Lerman A;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 8(6):824-833. PubMed ID: 25999106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.