These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28221437)

  • 1. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
    Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Munoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz De Zarate B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-745. PubMed ID: 28221437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
    Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency doubling perimetry in patients with mild and moderate pituitary tumor-associated visual field defects detected by conventional perimetry.
    Monteiro ML; Moura FC; Cunha LP
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 17589707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
    Wesselink C; Jansonius NM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kook MS; Yang SJ; Kim S; Chung J; Kim ST; Tchah H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15234286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
    Chiseliţa D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
    Hu R; Wang C; Racette L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
    Fan X; Wu LL; Ma ZZ; Xiao GG; Liu F
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?
    Fong KC; Byles DB; Constable PH
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Apr; 17(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12724694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry.
    Casson R; James B; Rubinstein A; Ali H
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Mar; 85(3):360-2. PubMed ID: 11222348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.