423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28223237)
1. Consumer preferences for sustainable aquaculture products: Evidence from in-depth interviews, think aloud protocols and choice experiments.
Risius A; Janssen M; Hamm U
Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():246-254. PubMed ID: 28223237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consumer attitudes and preferences towards pangasius and tilapia: The role of sustainability certification and the country of origin.
Hinkes C; Schulze-Ehlers B
Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():171-181. PubMed ID: 29733863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.
Menozzi D; Nguyen TT; Sogari G; Taskov D; Lucas S; Castro-Rial JLS; Mora C
Nutrients; 2020 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32878105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cross-cultural perspective on impact of health and nutrition claims, country-of-origin and eco-label on consumer choice of new aquaculture products.
Banovic M; Reinders MJ; Claret A; Guerrero L; Krystallis A
Food Res Int; 2019 Sep; 123():36-47. PubMed ID: 31284987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Please don't throw me in the briar patch! Empirical evidence on the role of instructional cues on eco-label usage in fish consumption decisions.
De Bauw M; Peracaula Moner A; Santa Cruz E; Vranken L
Appetite; 2024 Jun; 197():107291. PubMed ID: 38485058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of nutrition labels and advertising claims in altering consumers' evaluation and choice.
Bialkova S; Sasse L; Fenko A
Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():38-46. PubMed ID: 26341955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of sustainability information on consumers' liking of freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii).
Simoes JS; Mársico ET; da Cruz AG; de Freitas MQ; Doro LH; Conte-Junior CA
J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Dec; 95(15):3160-4. PubMed ID: 25523642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of an eco-score label on US consumers' perceptions of environmental sustainability and intentions to purchase food: A randomized experiment.
Taillie LS; Wolfson JA; Prestemon CE; Bercholz M; Ewoldt L; Ruggles PR; Hall MG
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0306123. PubMed ID: 38935699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Convenience food with environmentally-sustainable attributes: A consumer perspective.
Stranieri S; Ricci EC; Banterle A
Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():11-20. PubMed ID: 28428152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consumers' purchase decisions for products with nutrition and health claims: What role do product category and gaze duration on claims play?
Steinhauser J; Janssen M; Hamm U
Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104337. PubMed ID: 31260708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consumer beliefs regarding farmed versus wild fish.
Claret A; Guerrero L; Ginés R; Grau A; Hernández MD; Aguirre E; Peleteiro JB; Fernández-Pato C; Rodríguez-Rodríguez C
Appetite; 2014 Aug; 79():25-31. PubMed ID: 24709486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consumer Perception of Sustainability Attributes in Organic and Local Food.
Annunziata A; Mariani A
Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric; 2018; 9(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 29299996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing consumption of farmed seafood products in the Pacific northwest.
Hall TE; Amberg SM
Appetite; 2013 Jul; 66():1-9. PubMed ID: 23428939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Promising ethical arguments for product differentiation in the organic food sector. A mixed methods research approach.
Zander K; Stolz H; Hamm U
Appetite; 2013 Mar; 62():133-42. PubMed ID: 23207189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Who Buys Products with Nutrition and Health Claims? A Purchase Simulation with Eye Tracking on the Influence of Consumers' Nutrition Knowledge and Health Motivation.
Steinhauser J; Janssen M; Hamm U
Nutrients; 2019 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 31547369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vaccination and consumer perception of seafood quality.
Engelstad M
Dev Biol (Basel); 2005; 121():245-54. PubMed ID: 15962487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consumer response to health and environmental sustainability information regarding seafood consumption.
Jacobs S; Sioen I; Marques A; Verbeke W
Environ Res; 2018 Feb; 161():492-504. PubMed ID: 29223111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?
Withall E; Wilson AM; Henderson J; Tonkin E; Coveney J; Meyer SB; Clark J; McCullum D; Ankeny R; Ward PR
BMC Public Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):1241. PubMed ID: 27938403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing importance and confidence for production and source attributes of seafood among residents and tourists in South Carolina and Florida coastal communities.
Jodice LW; Norman WC
Appetite; 2020 Mar; 146():104510. PubMed ID: 31698016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels.
Peschel AO; Grebitus C; Steiner B; Veeman M
Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():78-91. PubMed ID: 26944229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
