These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28223237)

  • 21. An empirical assessment of common or usual names to label cell-based seafood products.
    Hallman WK; Hallman WK
    J Food Sci; 2020 Aug; 85(8):2267-2277. PubMed ID: 32691419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies.
    Carlucci D; Nocella G; De Devitiis B; Viscecchia R; Bimbo F; Nardone G
    Appetite; 2015 Jan; 84():212-27. PubMed ID: 25453592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consumers' environmental and ethical consciousness and the use of the related food products information: The role of perceived consumer effectiveness.
    Ghvanidze S; Velikova N; Dodd TH; Oldewage-Theron W
    Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():311-322. PubMed ID: 27554182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
    Sonoda Y; Oishi K; Chomei Y; Hirooka H
    Meat Sci; 2018 Dec; 146():75-86. PubMed ID: 30103081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage.
    Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P
    Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The determinants of live fish consumption frequency in South Korea.
    Lee MK; Nam J
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jun; 120():382-388. PubMed ID: 31000253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How important is local food to organic-minded consumers?
    Hempel C; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():309-318. PubMed ID: 26432955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consumers' purchase of organic food products. A matter of convenience and reflexive practices.
    Hjelmar U
    Appetite; 2011 Apr; 56(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 21192997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The price of good welfare: Does informing consumers about what on-package labels mean for animal welfare influence their purchase intentions?
    Cornish AR; Briley D; Wilson BJ; Raubenheimer D; Schlosberg D; McGreevy PD
    Appetite; 2020 May; 148():104577. PubMed ID: 31904389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The dynamics of consumer behaviour. On habit, discontent, and other fish to fry.
    Scholderer J; Trondsen T
    Appetite; 2008 Nov; 51(3):576-91. PubMed ID: 18499300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ethics in aquaculture: animal welfare and environmental sustainability.
    Ciliberti R; Alfano L; Petralia P
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2023 Dec; 64(4):E443-E447. PubMed ID: 38379740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Life cycle considerations for improving sustainability assessments in seafood awareness campaigns.
    Pelletier N; Tyedmers P
    Environ Manage; 2008 Nov; 42(5):918-31. PubMed ID: 18506514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Labeling strategies to overcome the problem of niche markets for sustainable milk products: The example of pasture-raised milk.
    Kühl S; Gassler B; Spiller A
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jun; 100(6):5082-5096. PubMed ID: 28434723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Survey into the seafood consumption preferences and patterns in the portuguese population. Gender and regional variability.
    Cardoso C; Lourenço H; Costa S; Gonçalves S; Nunes ML
    Appetite; 2013 May; 64():20-31. PubMed ID: 23318654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Natural Experiment: Using Immersive Technologies to Study the Impact of "All-Natural" Labeling on Perceived Food Quality, Nutritional Content, and Liking.
    Liu R; Hooker NH; Parasidis E; Simons CT
    J Food Sci; 2017 Mar; 82(3):825-833. PubMed ID: 28178361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does environmental friendliness equal healthiness? Swiss consumers' perception of protein products.
    Lazzarini GA; Zimmermann J; Visschers VH; Siegrist M
    Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():663-73. PubMed ID: 27378749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not.
    Vanhonacker F; Verbeke W
    Poult Sci; 2009 Dec; 88(12):2702-11. PubMed ID: 19903971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers.
    Hersey JC; Wohlgenant KC; Arsenault JE; Kosa KM; Muth MK
    Nutr Rev; 2013 Jan; 71(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23282247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Organic milk preference: is it a matter of information?
    Scozzafava G; Gerini F; Boncinelli F; Contini C; Marone E; Casini L
    Appetite; 2020 Jan; 144():104477. PubMed ID: 31574269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.