174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28224175)
1. Differences between active and passive self-ligating brackets for orthodontic treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials.
Yang X; He Y; Chen T; Zhao M; Yan Y; Wang H; Bai D
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Mar; 78(2):121-128. PubMed ID: 28224175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : A quantitative systematic review.
Yang X; Xue C; He Y; Zhao M; Luo M; Wang P; Bai D
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29101414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is there any difference between conventional, passive and active self-ligating brackets? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Maizeray R; Wagner D; Lefebvre F; Lévy-Bénichou H; Bolender Y
Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):523-538. PubMed ID: 34629309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of self-ligating brackets on oral hygiene and discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Yang X; Su N; Shi Z; Xiang Z; He Y; Han X; Bai D
Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 Feb; 15(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 27095145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of anchorage loss between conventional and self-ligating brackets during canine retraction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Malik DES; Fida M; Afzal E; Irfan S
Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 31866192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Root resorption during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yi J; Li M; Li Y; Li X; Zhao Z
BMC Oral Health; 2016 Nov; 16(1):125. PubMed ID: 27871255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of self-ligating bracket type and vibration on frictional force and stick-slip phenomenon in diverse tooth displacement conditions: an in vitro mechanical analysis.
Seo YJ; Lim BS; Park YG; Yang IH; Ahn SJ; Kim TW; Baek SH
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):474-80. PubMed ID: 25452628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.
Čelar A; Schedlberger M; Dörfler P; Bertl M
J Orofac Orthop; 2013 Jan; 74(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 23299650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of bracket ligation on the periodontal status of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arnold S; Koletsi D; Patcas R; Eliades T
J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():13-24. PubMed ID: 27546466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different bracket-archwire combinations for simulated correction of two-dimensional tooth malalignment: Leveling outcomes and initial force systems.
Holtmann S; Konermann A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Montasser M; El-Bialy T; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 25344125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Curing lights for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fleming PS; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S92-103. PubMed ID: 23540642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Therapeutic efficacy of self-ligating brackets: A systematic review.
Dehbi H; Azaroual MF; Zaoui F; Halimi A; Benyahia H
Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 28778722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Fleming PS; Lee RT; Marinho V; Johal A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23910199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.
Scott P; DiBiase AT; Sherriff M; Cobourne MT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):470.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18929262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. No reliable evidence to guide initial arch wire choice for fixed appliance therapy.
Flores-Mir C
Evid Based Dent; 2013 Dec; 14(4):114-5. PubMed ID: 24357824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
