These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28225151)
1. Cytopathologic differential diagnosis of low-grade urothelial carcinoma and reactive urothelial proliferation in bladder washings: a logistic regression analysis. Cakir E; Kucuk U; Pala EE; Sezer O; Ekin RG; Cakmak O APMIS; 2017 May; 125(5):431-436. PubMed ID: 28225151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-grade urothelial carcinoma: reappraisal of the cytologic criteria on ThinPrep. Xin W; Raab SS; Michael CW Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Sep; 29(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 12951678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is a consistent cytologic diagnosis of low-grade urothelial carcinoma in instrumented urinary tract cytologic specimens possible? A comparison between cytomorphologic features of low-grade urothelial carcinoma and non-neoplastic changes shows extensive overlap, making a reliable diagnosis impossible. McCroskey Z; Kliethermes S; Bahar B; Barkan GA; Pambuccian SE; Wojcik EM J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2015; 4(2):90-97. PubMed ID: 31051715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytologic evaluation of low grade transitional cell carcinoma and instrument artifact in bladder washings. Chu YC; Han JY; Han HS; Kim JM; Suh JK Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 11917583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of a minor high-grade component in a low-grade noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma of bladder. Reis LO; Taheri D; Chaux A; Guner G; Mendoza Rodriguez MA; Bivalacqua TJ; Schoenberg MP; Epstein JI; Netto GJ Hum Pathol; 2016 Jan; 47(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 26520419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytopathologic differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells: A logistic regression analysis. Cakir E; Demirag F; Aydin M; Unsal E Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 18973123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and interobserver variability of the cytologic diagnosis of low-grade urothelial carcinoma in instrumented urinary tract cytology specimens. McCroskey Z; Pambuccian SE; Kleitherms S; Antic T; Cohen MB; Barkan GA; Wojcik EM Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Dec; 144(6):902-8. PubMed ID: 26572997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional cell groups with disordered nuclei and cellular discohesion (3DDD) are associated with high sensitivity and specificity for cystoscopic urine cytopathological diagnosis of low-grade urothelial neoplasia. Mai KT; Ball CG; Kos Z; Belanger EC; Islam S; Sekhon H Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Jul; 42(7):555-63. PubMed ID: 24273035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hypochromatic large urothelial cells in urine cytology are indicative of high grade urothelial carcinoma. Pierconti F; Martini M; Straccia P; Fiorentino V; Musarra T; Larocca LM; Lopez-Beltran A APMIS; 2018 Sep; 126(9):705-709. PubMed ID: 30160022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cytomorphological features of low-grade urothelial neoplasms vary by specimen type. Zhang ML; Rosenthal DL; VandenBussche CJ Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Aug; 124(8):552-64. PubMed ID: 27019161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytomorphological characteristics of low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma for differential diagnosis from benign papillary urothelial lesions: logistic regression analysis in SurePath(™) liquid-based voided urine cytology. Chung YR; Won JK; Park IA; Moon KC; Chung SY; Lee K; Ryu HS Cytopathology; 2016 Apr; 27(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 25580773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is Diagnosis of Low-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma Possible in Urine Cytology? Bansal S; Pathuthara S; Joseph S; Dighe S; Menon S; Desai SB J Cytol; 2021; 38(2):64-68. PubMed ID: 34321771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cytological findings of the micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma: a comparison with typical high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Kim KH; Choi CH; Han JY; Kim L; Choi SJ; Park IS; Kim JM; Chu YC Korean J Pathol; 2013 Aug; 47(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24009632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low grade transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cytologic diagnosis by key features as identified by logistic regression analysis. Raab SS; Lenel JC; Cohen MB Cancer; 1994 Sep; 74(5):1621-6. PubMed ID: 8062194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia of the urinary bladder. Wu A Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Oct; 138(10):1268-71. PubMed ID: 25268187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytologic and cystoscopic predictors of recurrence and progression in patients with low-grade urothelial carcinoma. Jackson J; Barkan GA; Kapur U; Wojcik EM Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Jul; 121(7):398-402. PubMed ID: 23364860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current status of urinary cytology in the evaluation of bladder neoplasms. Murphy WM Hum Pathol; 1990 Sep; 21(9):886-96. PubMed ID: 2203672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of the current World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists bladder neoplasm classification system on urine cytology results. Curry JL; Wojcik EM Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 12115301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]