258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28225577)
21. Variability of 4D flow parameters when subjected to changes in MRI acquisition parameters using a realistic thoracic aortic phantom.
Montalba C; Urbina J; Sotelo J; Andia ME; Tejos C; Irarrazaval P; Hurtado DE; Valverde I; Uribe S
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):1882-1892. PubMed ID: 28714282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Variable velocity encoding in a three-dimensional, three-directional phase contrast sequence: Evaluation in phantom and volunteers.
Nilsson A; Markenroth Bloch K; Carlsson M; Heiberg E; Ståhlberg F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1450-9. PubMed ID: 23065951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Towards high-resolution 4D flow MRI in the human aorta using kt-GRAPPA and B1+ shimming at 7T.
Schmitter S; Schnell S; Uğurbil K; Markl M; Van de Moortele PF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Aug; 44(2):486-99. PubMed ID: 26841070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Voxel-by-voxel 4D flow MRI-based assessment of regional reverse flow in the aorta.
Shen X; Schnell S; Barker AJ; Suwa K; Tashakkor L; Jarvis K; Carr JC; Collins JD; Prabhakaran S; Markl M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1276-1286. PubMed ID: 28925047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reproducibility of Aorta Segmentation on 4D Flow MRI in Healthy Volunteers.
Juffermans JF; Westenberg JJM; van den Boogaard PJ; Roest AAW; van Assen HC; van der Palen RLF; Lamb HJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Apr; 53(4):1268-1279. PubMed ID: 33179389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Free-breathing pediatric chest MRI: Performance of self-navigated golden-angle ordered conical ultrashort echo time acquisition.
Zucker EJ; Cheng JY; Haldipur A; Carl M; Vasanawala SS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 47(1):200-209. PubMed ID: 28570032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Velocity reconstruction with nonconvex optimization for low-velocity-encoding phase-contrast MRI.
Loecher M; Ennis DB
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jul; 80(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 29130519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics.
Bollache E; van Ooij P; Powell A; Carr J; Markl M; Barker AJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1529-41. PubMed ID: 27435230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Seed prioritized unwrapping (SPUN) for MR phase imaging.
Ye Y; Zhou F; Zong J; Lyu J; Chen Y; Zhang S; Zhang W; He Q; Li X; Li M; Zhang Q; Qing Z; Zhang B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 50(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 30569494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of principal component analysis acceleration factor on velocity measurement in 2D and 4D PC-MRI.
Pagé G; Bettoni J; Salsac AV; Balédent O
MAGMA; 2018 Jun; 31(3):469-481. PubMed ID: 29357015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Scan-rescan reproducibility of segmental aortic wall shear stress as assessed by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers.
van der Palen RLF; Roest AAW; van den Boogaard PJ; de Roos A; Blom NA; Westenberg JJM
MAGMA; 2018 Oct; 31(5):653-663. PubMed ID: 29804208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Advances in real-time phase-contrast flow MRI using asymmetric radial gradient echoes.
Untenberger M; Tan Z; Voit D; Joseph AA; Roeloffs V; Merboldt KD; Schätz S; Frahm J
Magn Reson Med; 2016 May; 75(5):1901-8. PubMed ID: 26096085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization.
Bock J; Frydrychowicz A; Stalder AF; Bley TA; Burkhardt H; Hennig J; Markl M
Magn Reson Med; 2010 Feb; 63(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 20024953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of blood flow assessment in cerebral arteries with 4D flow MRI: Evaluation with three segmentation methods.
Dunås T; Holmgren M; Wåhlin A; Malm J; Eklund A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):511-518. PubMed ID: 30637846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of multi-velocity encoding 4D flow MRI to improve quantification of flow patterns in the aorta.
Callaghan FM; Kozor R; Sherrah AG; Vallely M; Celermajer D; Figtree GA; Grieve SM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):352-63. PubMed ID: 26130421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Flow-sensitive 4D MRI of the thoracic aorta: comparison of image quality, quantitative flow, and wall parameters at 1.5 T and 3 T.
Strecker C; Harloff A; Wallis W; Markl M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1097-103. PubMed ID: 22745007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of four-dimensional phase-contrast velocity mapping for blood flow visualizations: a phantom study.
Nilsson A; Bloch KM; Töger J; Heiberg E; Ståhlberg F
Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 23486562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantification and comparison of 4D-flow MRI-derived wall shear stress and MRE-derived wall stiffness of the abdominal aorta.
Kolipaka A; Illapani VS; Kalra P; Garcia J; Mo X; Markl M; White RD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):771-778. PubMed ID: 27603433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pulse wave velocity with 4D flow MRI: systematic differences and age-related regional vascular stiffness.
Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T; Länne T
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 32(10):1266-71. PubMed ID: 25171817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation and reproducibility of cardiovascular 4D-flow MRI from two vendors using 2 × 2 parallel imaging acceleration in pulsatile flow phantom and in vivo with and without respiratory gating.
Bock J; Töger J; Bidhult S; Markenroth Bloch K; Arvidsson P; Kanski M; Arheden H; Testud F; Greiser A; Heiberg E; Carlsson M
Acta Radiol; 2019 Mar; 60(3):327-337. PubMed ID: 30479136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
