These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28226377)

  • 21. Quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: assessment of surgical scars from clinical photographs.
    Kim MS; Rodney WN; Reece GP; Beahm EK; Crosby MA; Markey MK
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1075-82. PubMed ID: 20630016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale When Used With Postsurgical Scar Photographs.
    Shao K; Parker JC; Taylor L; Mitra N; Sobanko JF
    Dermatol Surg; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1650-1652. PubMed ID: 29381545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring.
    Brown BC; Moss TP; McGrouther DA; Bayat A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jun; 63(6):1022-9. PubMed ID: 19501559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nonablative fractional laser resurfacing for the treatment of scars and grafts after Mohs micrographic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Verhaeghe E; Ongenae K; Dierckxsens L; Bostoen J; Lambert J
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 22757665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fractional photothermolysis improves a depressed alar scar following Mohs micrographic surgery.
    Schulz KK; Walling HW
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2010 Jan; 9(1):66-7. PubMed ID: 20120428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does wound eversion improve cosmetic outcome?: Results of a randomized, split-scar, comparative trial.
    Kappel S; Kleinerman R; King TH; Sivamani R; Taylor S; Nguyen U; Eisen DB
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 Apr; 72(4):668-73. PubMed ID: 25619206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment.
    Beausang E; Floyd H; Dunn KW; Orton CI; Ferguson MW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Nov; 102(6):1954-61. PubMed ID: 9810991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of a needling device for the treatment of acne scars: a randomized clinical trial.
    Alam M; Han S; Pongprutthipan M; Disphanurat W; Kakar R; Nodzenski M; Pace N; Kim N; Yoo S; Veledar E; Poon E; West DP
    JAMA Dermatol; 2014 Aug; 150(8):844-9. PubMed ID: 24919799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Facial Scars: Do Position and Orientation Matter?
    Zapatero ZD; Workman CI; Kalmar CL; Humphries S; Kosyk MS; Carlson AR; Swanson JW; Chatterjee A; Taylor JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Dec; 150(6):1237-1246. PubMed ID: 36112839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving the Appearance of Surgical Facial Scars With IncobotulinumtoxinA and Microneedling.
    Casabona GR; Giacomo TB
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 19(6):611-615. PubMed ID: 32574010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantification of Erythema Associated With Continuous Versus Interrupted Nylon Sutures in Facial Surgery Repair: A Randomized Prospective Study.
    Majd A; Akbari A; Zloty D
    Dermatol Surg; 2020 Jun; 46(6):757-762. PubMed ID: 31490310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of the scar prevention effect between carbon dioxide fractional laser and pulsed dye laser in surgical scars.
    Kim DH; Ryu HJ; Choi JE; Ahn HH; Kye YC; Seo SH
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Sep; 40(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 25111438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient opinion of scarring is multidimensional: An investigation of the POSAS with confirmatory factor analysis.
    DeJong HM; Phillips M; Edgar DW; Wood FM
    Burns; 2017 Feb; 43(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 27576936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient reported facial scar assessment: directions for the professional.
    Hoogewerf CJ; van Baar ME; Middelkoop E; van Loey NE
    Burns; 2014 Mar; 40(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 24138808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for evaluation of facial scars treated with self-drying silicone gel.
    Bianchi FA; Roccia F; Fiorini P; Berrone S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 20485035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scar Revision and Recontouring Post-Mohs Surgery.
    Cerrati EW; Thomas JR
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2017 Aug; 25(3):463-471. PubMed ID: 28676169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Wave Flap: A Single-Stage, Modified Nasal Sidewall Rotation Flap for the Repair of Defects Involving the Mid-Alar Groove.
    Bryan ZT; Garrett AB; Lavigne K; Trace A; Maher IA
    Dermatol Surg; 2016 Feb; 42(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 26808187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Measure of a Scar: Patient Perceptions and Scar Optimization after Skin Cancer Reconstruction.
    Drake VE; Moyer JS
    Facial Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 39(5):501-507. PubMed ID: 37290453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Cisari C; Bravini E
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 26426285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Health professionals' and consumers' opinion: what is considered important when rating burn scars from photographs?
    Simons M; Tyack Z
    J Burn Care Res; 2011; 32(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 21233729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.