119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28228165)
1. Determining Optimal Fluorescent Agent Concentrations in Dental Adhesive Resins for Imaging the Tooth/Restoration Interface.
Bim Júnior O; Cebim MA; Atta MT; Machado CM; Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF; Wang L
Microsc Microanal; 2017 Feb; 23(1):122-130. PubMed ID: 28228165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Water interaction and bond strength to dentin of dye-labelled adhesive as a function of the addition of rhodamine B.
Wang L; Bim O; Lopes AC; Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF; Maenosono RM; D'Alpino PH; Honório HM; Atta MT
J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 27556201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The morphology and stability of resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive at the dentin/resin-based composite interface.
Sidhu SK; Pilecki P; Cheng PC; Watson TF
Am J Dent; 2002 Apr; 15(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 12092991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of mode of fracture of adhesive restorative materials. An invitro study.
Nayak UA; Suasha P
Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 12420578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope investigation of different dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentine.
Bitter K; Paris S; Martus P; Schartner R; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):840-8. PubMed ID: 15548275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of operator-specific handling on tooth-composite interface and microleakage formation.
Schneider H; Busch I; Busch M; Jentsch H; Häfer M
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 19363976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Video rate confocal microscopic imaging of dentin/adhesive interfacial failure under load.
Griffiths BM; Watson TF; Pagliari DE; Pilecki P; Sherriff M
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):271-9. PubMed ID: 11764115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In situ characterization of resin-dentin interfaces using conventional vs. cryofocused ion-beam milling.
Bakhsh TA; Sadr A; Mandurah MM; Shimada Y; Zakaria O; Tagami J
Dent Mater; 2015 Jul; 31(7):833-44. PubMed ID: 25986333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term nanoleakage depth and pattern of cervical restorations bonded with different adhesives.
Mobarak EH; Daifalla LE
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 21942238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between degree of conversion, resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives.
Hass V; Dobrovolski M; Zander-Grande C; Martins GC; Gordillo LA; Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L; Gomes OM; Loguercio AD; Reis A
Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):921-8. PubMed ID: 23830512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new technique for assessing hybrid layer interfacial micromorphology and integrity: two-photon laser microscopy.
D'Alpino PH; Pereira JC; Svizero NR; Rueggeberg FA; Carvalho RM; Pashley DH
J Adhes Dent; 2006 Oct; 8(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 17080874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of desensitizing agents on the microtensile bond strength of a two-step self-etch adhesive to dentin.
Arisu HD; Dalkihç E; Üçtaşli MB
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 21777097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SEM evaluation of resin-carious dentin interfaces formed by two dentin adhesive systems.
Hsu KW; Marshall SJ; Pinzon LM; Watanabe L; Saiz E; Marshall GW
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):880-7. PubMed ID: 18155289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
