BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28228165)

  • 21. Bonding ability of three ethanol-based adhesives after thermal fatigue.
    Perdigão J; Gomes G; Sezinando A
    Am J Dent; 2011 Jun; 24(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 21874936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 3-year clinical effectiveness of one-step adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Moretto SG; Russo EM; Carvalho RC; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Cardoso MV
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 23747824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acoustic emission analysis of tooth-composite interfacial debonding.
    Cho NY; Ferracane JL; Lee IB
    J Dent Res; 2013 Jan; 92(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 23100273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of adhesive application duration on dentin bond strength of single-application bonding systems.
    Miyazaki M; Tsubota K; Onose H; Hinoura K
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):278-83. PubMed ID: 12022460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The development of a composite restorative system.
    Henderson LJ; Soh G; Chantler P
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1989 Sep; 18(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 2694914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro evaluation of the bond strength of composite resin foundation materials to dentin.
    Al-Ansari A; Al-Harbi F; Baba NZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 26187101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations.
    D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; D'Amario M; Zazzeroni S; Ciampoli C; Caputi S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 19544823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bonding efficacy of single-step self-etch systems to sound primary and permanent tooth dentin.
    Uekusa S; Yamaguchi K; Miyazaki M; Tsubota K; Kurokawa H; Hosoya Y
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 17024945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Boron nitride nanotubes as novel fillers for improving the properties of dental adhesives.
    Degrazia FW; Leitune VCB; Samuel SMW; Collares FM
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():85-90. PubMed ID: 28545818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative evaluation of four adhesive tooth coloured restorative materials. An invitro study.
    Nayak UA; Sudha P; Vidya M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12420568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin.
    Bitter K; Paris S; Pfuertner C; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 19583763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage at the composite-dentin interface.
    Ding PG; Wolff D; Pioch T; Staehle HJ; Dannewitz B
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 18606443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bonding potential of self-adhesive luting agents used at different temperatures to lute composite onlays.
    Cantoro A; Goracci C; Carvalho CA; Coniglio I; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):454-61. PubMed ID: 19339100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A confocal microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface using adhesive systems with three different solvents bonded to dry and moist dentinan in vitro study.
    Mohan B; Kandaswamy D
    Quintessence Int; 2005; 36(7-8):511-21. PubMed ID: 15997932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds with one-bottle self-etching adhesives.
    Hashimoto M; Fujita S; Endo K; Ohno H
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Oct; 117(5):611-7. PubMed ID: 19758260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dentin and enamel bond strengths of dual-cure composite luting agents used with dual-cure dental adhesives.
    Ritter AV; Ghaname E; Pimenta LA
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18926614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.